Investigator
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
That tree damage, according to the testimony of a botanist from the University of Wisconsin, was reminiscent of a fire and appears to have happened at the same time Nathan claimed Bonnie's body had been burned. As a prosecutor, why is that critical?
That tree damage, according to the testimony of a botanist from the University of Wisconsin, was reminiscent of a fire and appears to have happened at the same time Nathan claimed Bonnie's body had been burned. As a prosecutor, why is that critical?
There's a question, was there actually evidence of a fire? Or is it a fire around the time of 2010? Or is it not a fire? That's questionable.
There's a question, was there actually evidence of a fire? Or is it a fire around the time of 2010? Or is it not a fire? That's questionable.
There's a question, was there actually evidence of a fire? Or is it a fire around the time of 2010? Or is it not a fire? That's questionable.
How did Heather do on the stand? What was her testimony like?
How did Heather do on the stand? What was her testimony like?
How did Heather do on the stand? What was her testimony like?
What made her cry on the stand, do you remember?
What made her cry on the stand, do you remember?
What made her cry on the stand, do you remember?
Bonnie's boyfriend, Gary, took to the stand too and told the jury about what was lost when Bonnie's life was cut short.
Bonnie's boyfriend, Gary, took to the stand too and told the jury about what was lost when Bonnie's life was cut short.
Bonnie's boyfriend, Gary, took to the stand too and told the jury about what was lost when Bonnie's life was cut short.
When it was their turn, the defense team laid out a case that pointed the finger at Nathan as Bonnie's killer and argued that without him and the so-called golden ticket, the state's case was just circumstantial.
When it was their turn, the defense team laid out a case that pointed the finger at Nathan as Bonnie's killer and argued that without him and the so-called golden ticket, the state's case was just circumstantial.
When it was their turn, the defense team laid out a case that pointed the finger at Nathan as Bonnie's killer and argued that without him and the so-called golden ticket, the state's case was just circumstantial.
He was advised not to testify. Many attorneys advise their clients not to testify because, for one thing, they think it will shift the burden. They think the jury's gonna look at whether they believe the defendant, and suddenly the defendant has to prove his innocence, which he normally doesn't have to do.
He was advised not to testify. Many attorneys advise their clients not to testify because, for one thing, they think it will shift the burden. They think the jury's gonna look at whether they believe the defendant, and suddenly the defendant has to prove his innocence, which he normally doesn't have to do.
He was advised not to testify. Many attorneys advise their clients not to testify because, for one thing, they think it will shift the burden. They think the jury's gonna look at whether they believe the defendant, and suddenly the defendant has to prove his innocence, which he normally doesn't have to do.