Investigator
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
I think Nathan realizes dad tried to kill his mom. And that's just crossing the line. If you think about Nathan, he is a young child. And he's being controlled by dad, and he witnesses something horrific.
I think Nathan realizes dad tried to kill his mom. And that's just crossing the line. If you think about Nathan, he is a young child. And he's being controlled by dad, and he witnesses something horrific.
The son, Nathan, testifies. And I'm told that it was a very stirring, powerful testimony. What do you remember of it?
The son, Nathan, testifies. And I'm told that it was a very stirring, powerful testimony. What do you remember of it?
The son, Nathan, testifies. And I'm told that it was a very stirring, powerful testimony. What do you remember of it?
Nathan's testimony doesn't really make sense. Nathan keeps saying he's reluctant, he did it anyway. Why would Nathan help his father do it? What's in it for him? It's a big mystery.
Nathan's testimony doesn't really make sense. Nathan keeps saying he's reluctant, he did it anyway. Why would Nathan help his father do it? What's in it for him? It's a big mystery.
Nathan's testimony doesn't really make sense. Nathan keeps saying he's reluctant, he did it anyway. Why would Nathan help his father do it? What's in it for him? It's a big mystery.
But the defense just keeps chipping away at that evidence, including those 27 bone fragments that were found on the property. In fact, there's a rather big bombshell in store for the jury.
But the defense just keeps chipping away at that evidence, including those 27 bone fragments that were found on the property. In fact, there's a rather big bombshell in store for the jury.
But the defense just keeps chipping away at that evidence, including those 27 bone fragments that were found on the property. In fact, there's a rather big bombshell in store for the jury.
Bones were found, but they're not the bones of the deceased.
Bones were found, but they're not the bones of the deceased.
Bones were found, but they're not the bones of the deceased.
In fact, it's not clear if they're human bones or animal bones or whether they're bones that were from an Indian burial many years ago.
In fact, it's not clear if they're human bones or animal bones or whether they're bones that were from an Indian burial many years ago.
In fact, it's not clear if they're human bones or animal bones or whether they're bones that were from an Indian burial many years ago.
Prosecutors argued that the bones were degraded by the fire, which Nathan described that burned Bonnie's body. And to prove that there actually was a fire on the property, the prosecution used an unexpected method and witness.
Prosecutors argued that the bones were degraded by the fire, which Nathan described that burned Bonnie's body. And to prove that there actually was a fire on the property, the prosecution used an unexpected method and witness.
Prosecutors argued that the bones were degraded by the fire, which Nathan described that burned Bonnie's body. And to prove that there actually was a fire on the property, the prosecution used an unexpected method and witness.