Inyash Brodsky

And do you want to do that?

And I think for Anthropic, the most important thing for them, rightly, is how are all the future clods going to be?

Are they going to be good, safe bots?

Or are they going to become more evil?

And what we're doing right now is not a statement that Pentagon can't use this tool in this way.

It's a, we are shaping the future of this thing that we are creating and what it will be.

And that is the most important thing to them.

And that is absolutely correct, in my opinion.

That should be the most important thing.

anthropic continues to demonstrate that they've never taken their eye off the ball of let's make this thing happy helpful and honest and that this is a it's not just a tool it's sort of borderline person now like i don't know if it's conscious i don't know if it has moral weight but it is not wrong to think of it as a a person that is being trained i guess i guess the term anthropic is is pretty on the money like if you anthropomorphize these lms you're kind of doing it right yeah yeah

True.

True.

It does remind me a lot of, uh, the New York times reporter that interviewed Sidney Bing, Kevin Roos, I think was, he was, and then, uh, yeah, Sidney Bing had a grudge against him.

And then that propagated into future LLMs that like, he's only now in the past few months getting over the LLMs background hatred of him.

I believe in Ukraine, oftentimes the drones, like the operators will choose the target and then the drone chooses how to engage it.

I mean, that's not going to remain the case forever, especially as these things get faster and faster and they, you know, the human can't respond fast enough against countermeasures.

So the drone was going to have to take control or get shot down.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Well, I think the .0 implies no maimings.