J.D. Vance

Yeah, I'm sure that you could find one person who would maybe celebrate it or one person who would be offensive.

But the fact that it became mainstream to celebrate Charlie's death, to talk about the fact that he maybe deserved to die because he had said hateful things like that just wasn't happening.

George, you've covered the story ad nauseum.

Tom Homan did not take a bribe.

A ridiculous smear, and the reason you guys are going after Tom Homan so aggressively is because he's doing the job of enforcing the law.

I think it's really preposterous.

I know Tom.

I think that he's a good man.

He gets death threats.

He gets attacked.

He gets constantly threatened by people because he has the audacity to want to enforce the country's immigration law.

I think that it would be a much more interesting story about why is it that Tom Homan, who is simply enforcing Americans' immigration laws, is getting constantly harassed and threatened to the point of death threats.

That's a much more interesting question that I think journalists should focus on.

We can agree to disagree on that question.

George, this story has been covered ad nauseum.

He did not take a bribe.

Did he accept fifty thousand dollars?

I'm sure that in the course of Tom Homan's life, he has been paid more than fifty thousand dollars for services.

The question is, did he do something illegal?

And there's absolutely no evidence that Tom Holman has ever taken a bribe with anything illegal, which is why he's working in the administration.