J.P. Shadrick

Because you forgot that we were going to go back during a break.

We talked about this because there was a word that I was looking for when it came to this possibility of a rule change that involves New York.

And the one thing that hasn't existed...

In the process of New York being involved in the past has been the word I was looking for, transparency.

You found it.

Well, you found it.

I found it.

I didn't realize you were looking for it.

If there's transparency with having a panel of people involved, whether it's for...

unqualified new officials that we're replacing the good officials with, or whether it's to help the good officials in certain moments of a game that they may not see, if there's transparency, then I'm okay with it.

But if there's not transparency, then why would there not be?

Then why have them involved at all?

I mean, if...

Because the way it's set up now is that the guys and the officials on the field, and girls and ladies on the field, are responsible for what they do.

So now we're going to have something to where they get overruled or gets changed from New York, and then we don't know who made that decision.

What if it's the right call?

If there's transparency, JP, again, I'm all for it.

But there's got to be transparency.

So just like after a game, they have a pool reporter that is available to talk to an official, the referee of the game.

If you're going to make him available after the game,