James Pietragallo

The test that was done was pretty much meaningless.

The test that was done was pretty much meaningless.

Unless you have DN fucking A, it wouldn't have mattered, and they were just going on blood tests. It also seems there they said at trial the state put on its case in chief, and they made a motion to dismiss the indictment because of the state's destruction of the vaginal swab, and it was denied, obviously.

Unless you have DN fucking A, it wouldn't have mattered, and they were just going on blood tests. It also seems there they said at trial the state put on its case in chief, and they made a motion to dismiss the indictment because of the state's destruction of the vaginal swab, and it was denied, obviously.

Unless you have DN fucking A, it wouldn't have mattered, and they were just going on blood tests. It also seems there they said at trial the state put on its case in chief, and they made a motion to dismiss the indictment because of the state's destruction of the vaginal swab, and it was denied, obviously.

So in openings, the prosecutor said Stephen Linscott not only described how a young lady had died in a living room setting, how she was first on her hands and knees and then fell to the floor. He demonstrated with up and down full extension of the right hand what he saw the man do. That's consistent with high velocity bloodstains found on her body and apartment.

So in openings, the prosecutor said Stephen Linscott not only described how a young lady had died in a living room setting, how she was first on her hands and knees and then fell to the floor. He demonstrated with up and down full extension of the right hand what he saw the man do. That's consistent with high velocity bloodstains found on her body and apartment.

So in openings, the prosecutor said Stephen Linscott not only described how a young lady had died in a living room setting, how she was first on her hands and knees and then fell to the floor. He demonstrated with up and down full extension of the right hand what he saw the man do. That's consistent with high velocity bloodstains found on her body and apartment.

Suffice it to say, in those tapes, he supplied information only the killer would and could know. And he elaborated in detail. The defense attorney said he's a deeply religious man. He couldn't do this. He's married to the daughter of a missionary family. His decision to reveal his dreams was a difficult one, but he made it because he believed he was it was his civil and moral duty.

Suffice it to say, in those tapes, he supplied information only the killer would and could know. And he elaborated in detail. The defense attorney said he's a deeply religious man. He couldn't do this. He's married to the daughter of a missionary family. His decision to reveal his dreams was a difficult one, but he made it because he believed he was it was his civil and moral duty.

Suffice it to say, in those tapes, he supplied information only the killer would and could know. And he elaborated in detail. The defense attorney said he's a deeply religious man. He couldn't do this. He's married to the daughter of a missionary family. His decision to reveal his dreams was a difficult one, but he made it because he believed he was it was his civil and moral duty.

He said that they said the prosecution's test of hair, blood and semen samples from the body are not conclusive. All you have is this dream. So, they said that the state's expert witness regarding the vaginal swab was at times either plainly doubtful or confusing. Here it is. Question. What, if anything, did you do with regard to that item? Answer.

He said that they said the prosecution's test of hair, blood and semen samples from the body are not conclusive. All you have is this dream. So, they said that the state's expert witness regarding the vaginal swab was at times either plainly doubtful or confusing. Here it is. Question. What, if anything, did you do with regard to that item? Answer.

He said that they said the prosecution's test of hair, blood and semen samples from the body are not conclusive. All you have is this dream. So, they said that the state's expert witness regarding the vaginal swab was at times either plainly doubtful or confusing. Here it is. Question. What, if anything, did you do with regard to that item? Answer.

Yes, I checked the swab for the presence of semen. Question. And what results did you receive? Answer. Answer, vaginal swab positive for seminal material. They said, and could you detect any ABO blood type from the seminal material? Yes, it was ABO.

Yes, I checked the swab for the presence of semen. Question. And what results did you receive? Answer. Answer, vaginal swab positive for seminal material. They said, and could you detect any ABO blood type from the seminal material? Yes, it was ABO.

Yes, I checked the swab for the presence of semen. Question. And what results did you receive? Answer. Answer, vaginal swab positive for seminal material. They said, and could you detect any ABO blood type from the seminal material? Yes, it was ABO.

It was ABO blood group O. They said, if this man was able to detect ABO blood type from the seminal material, then the depositor of the seminal material must have been a secretor. even though they already said Steve wasn't a secreter.

It was ABO blood group O. They said, if this man was able to detect ABO blood type from the seminal material, then the depositor of the seminal material must have been a secretor. even though they already said Steve wasn't a secreter.

It was ABO blood group O. They said, if this man was able to detect ABO blood type from the seminal material, then the depositor of the seminal material must have been a secretor. even though they already said Steve wasn't a secreter.