James Pietragallo

Moreover, if this testimony is to be taken as true, then the seminal material could not have been from Steve because he's a non-secreter and has type AB blood rather than O. So what do you think of that? Hair expert, they never say match. They say consistent because there is no way to match hair unless it's DNA.

Moreover, if this testimony is to be taken as true, then the seminal material could not have been from Steve because he's a non-secreter and has type AB blood rather than O. So what do you think of that? Hair expert, they never say match. They say consistent because there is no way to match hair unless it's DNA.

Moreover, if this testimony is to be taken as true, then the seminal material could not have been from Steve because he's a non-secreter and has type AB blood rather than O. So what do you think of that? Hair expert, they never say match. They say consistent because there is no way to match hair unless it's DNA.

So the defense hair expert, he also did not testify that the hairs matched or that they were identical. He testified that the hairs that were found either did not come from the defendant or had too few characteristics displayed for him to conclude they matched or did not match his hairs.

So the defense hair expert, he also did not testify that the hairs matched or that they were identical. He testified that the hairs that were found either did not come from the defendant or had too few characteristics displayed for him to conclude they matched or did not match his hairs.

So the defense hair expert, he also did not testify that the hairs matched or that they were identical. He testified that the hairs that were found either did not come from the defendant or had too few characteristics displayed for him to conclude they matched or did not match his hairs.

However, with respect to whether the pubic hairs that were found were the defendant's pubic hairs, he said they said in view is the question in view of the testing you've described with respect to the pubic hairs based on your observations and findings and analysis. Do you have an opinion based on reasonable degree of scientific certainty?

However, with respect to whether the pubic hairs that were found were the defendant's pubic hairs, he said they said in view is the question in view of the testing you've described with respect to the pubic hairs based on your observations and findings and analysis. Do you have an opinion based on reasonable degree of scientific certainty?

However, with respect to whether the pubic hairs that were found were the defendant's pubic hairs, he said they said in view is the question in view of the testing you've described with respect to the pubic hairs based on your observations and findings and analysis. Do you have an opinion based on reasonable degree of scientific certainty?

as to whether or not the pubic hair taken comes from Stephen. And he said, yes, I do. What's your opinion? He says, within a reasonable degree of certainty, I believe the hair from the combings did not come from the same source as the hair from the suspect.

as to whether or not the pubic hair taken comes from Stephen. And he said, yes, I do. What's your opinion? He says, within a reasonable degree of certainty, I believe the hair from the combings did not come from the same source as the hair from the suspect.

as to whether or not the pubic hair taken comes from Stephen. And he said, yes, I do. What's your opinion? He says, within a reasonable degree of certainty, I believe the hair from the combings did not come from the same source as the hair from the suspect.

OK, the prosecution asked this guy in cross if he was aware of a study that found all this one in forty five hundred people would have consistent hairs. They went back and forth in closings. OK, the prosecutor says he says you must ask yourself where the where is the link? The link is the semen matching the non secretor. Mr. Lynn Scott is a non secretor.

OK, the prosecution asked this guy in cross if he was aware of a study that found all this one in forty five hundred people would have consistent hairs. They went back and forth in closings. OK, the prosecutor says he says you must ask yourself where the where is the link? The link is the semen matching the non secretor. Mr. Lynn Scott is a non secretor.

OK, the prosecution asked this guy in cross if he was aware of a study that found all this one in forty five hundred people would have consistent hairs. They went back and forth in closings. OK, the prosecutor says he says you must ask yourself where the where is the link? The link is the semen matching the non secretor. Mr. Lynn Scott is a non secretor.

the like hairs more than one more than two more than three and you heard the probabilities from his own expert pubic hairs in the woman's crotch matching Mr. Linscott as they go into that he said I would suggest to you ladies and gentlemen if I said there were two American flags right there and they were both 12 by 8 and they both had the same number of stars and they both had the same number of stripes and they had the same coloring would you sit there and say well there's nothing dissimilar about those two they are identical

the like hairs more than one more than two more than three and you heard the probabilities from his own expert pubic hairs in the woman's crotch matching Mr. Linscott as they go into that he said I would suggest to you ladies and gentlemen if I said there were two American flags right there and they were both 12 by 8 and they both had the same number of stars and they both had the same number of stripes and they had the same coloring would you sit there and say well there's nothing dissimilar about those two they are identical

the like hairs more than one more than two more than three and you heard the probabilities from his own expert pubic hairs in the woman's crotch matching Mr. Linscott as they go into that he said I would suggest to you ladies and gentlemen if I said there were two American flags right there and they were both 12 by 8 and they both had the same number of stars and they both had the same number of stripes and they had the same coloring would you sit there and say well there's nothing dissimilar about those two they are identical

But not a scientist. A scientist will state that every aspect that I examined were consistent. And what does that mean? There was nothing different. And to a layman, that means identical as the two American flags. But that's not science, though, because they look alike to you at a glance.

But not a scientist. A scientist will state that every aspect that I examined were consistent. And what does that mean? There was nothing different. And to a layman, that means identical as the two American flags. But that's not science, though, because they look alike to you at a glance.