James Pietragallo

Now, there is a dissenting opinion here that says, I believe that the prosecutor's comments that the victim was raped by a nonsecretor were based on reasonable inferences, which could be drawn from the evidence of blood comparison test performed on the semen.

Now, there is a dissenting opinion here that says, I believe that the prosecutor's comments that the victim was raped by a nonsecretor were based on reasonable inferences, which could be drawn from the evidence of blood comparison test performed on the semen.

Now, there is a dissenting opinion here that says, I believe that the prosecutor's comments that the victim was raped by a nonsecretor were based on reasonable inferences, which could be drawn from the evidence of blood comparison test performed on the semen.

I find that the majority inaccurately depicts the prejudice of these comments by quoting them side by side when, in fact, they're separated by 63 pages in the trial's transcripts, 83 pages containing their closing arguments. So, yeah, this person basically says, and there was plenty of evidence. So he's now freed on $100,000 personal recognizance bond. Wow.

I find that the majority inaccurately depicts the prejudice of these comments by quoting them side by side when, in fact, they're separated by 63 pages in the trial's transcripts, 83 pages containing their closing arguments. So, yeah, this person basically says, and there was plenty of evidence. So he's now freed on $100,000 personal recognizance bond. Wow.

I find that the majority inaccurately depicts the prejudice of these comments by quoting them side by side when, in fact, they're separated by 63 pages in the trial's transcripts, 83 pages containing their closing arguments. So, yeah, this person basically says, and there was plenty of evidence. So he's now freed on $100,000 personal recognizance bond. Wow.

So Lois says that's the second piece of good news we've had, that he's going to be out. First they overturned his conviction. Now it looks like he's getting out next week. We knew he'd be vindicated, and the bond order is just further proof of that. When he gets released, he said he's going to the First Baptist Church in Centralia. Uh-huh.

So Lois says that's the second piece of good news we've had, that he's going to be out. First they overturned his conviction. Now it looks like he's getting out next week. We knew he'd be vindicated, and the bond order is just further proof of that. When he gets released, he said he's going to the First Baptist Church in Centralia. Uh-huh.

So Lois says that's the second piece of good news we've had, that he's going to be out. First they overturned his conviction. Now it looks like he's getting out next week. We knew he'd be vindicated, and the bond order is just further proof of that. When he gets released, he said he's going to the First Baptist Church in Centralia. Uh-huh.

where they had had a huge campaign to release him and a big she said and a huge party they're gonna get shit hammered i know he's gonna looking forward to meeting these people um the town also lois never expected such an outpouring of support from strangers but she said it was amazing to see to us that so many people got involved people have taken this case as their own truly as if they were a member of their own family they've cried for us they've prayed for us

where they had had a huge campaign to release him and a big she said and a huge party they're gonna get shit hammered i know he's gonna looking forward to meeting these people um the town also lois never expected such an outpouring of support from strangers but she said it was amazing to see to us that so many people got involved people have taken this case as their own truly as if they were a member of their own family they've cried for us they've prayed for us

where they had had a huge campaign to release him and a big she said and a huge party they're gonna get shit hammered i know he's gonna looking forward to meeting these people um the town also lois never expected such an outpouring of support from strangers but she said it was amazing to see to us that so many people got involved people have taken this case as their own truly as if they were a member of their own family they've cried for us they've prayed for us

In 1986, he's working as an ophthalmologist in Centralia, Illinois. Yeah. He's the practice manager. His wife teaches, does homeschooling for the kids and everything like that. But he's still, this charge is still there.

In 1986, he's working as an ophthalmologist in Centralia, Illinois. Yeah. He's the practice manager. His wife teaches, does homeschooling for the kids and everything like that. But he's still, this charge is still there.

In 1986, he's working as an ophthalmologist in Centralia, Illinois. Yeah. He's the practice manager. His wife teaches, does homeschooling for the kids and everything like that. But he's still, this charge is still there.

That's the thing. So then they afforded to Supreme because the they the overturning was appealed by the state to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court overturned the overturn and reinstated it with a four to two vote. They said defendant voluntarily came forward with an account of a, quote, dream that contained many unusual details which correlated with the actual murder.

That's the thing. So then they afforded to Supreme because the they the overturning was appealed by the state to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court overturned the overturn and reinstated it with a four to two vote. They said defendant voluntarily came forward with an account of a, quote, dream that contained many unusual details which correlated with the actual murder.

That's the thing. So then they afforded to Supreme because the they the overturning was appealed by the state to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court overturned the overturn and reinstated it with a four to two vote. They said defendant voluntarily came forward with an account of a, quote, dream that contained many unusual details which correlated with the actual murder.

In particular, his account of a beating knowledgeable of the murder weapon and knowledgeable of the victim's passive acceptance of the attack showed knowledge of the crime, which would not likely be available to anyone else but the murder. OK, 1987, the court orders a new trial for him. So he's going to get a new trial here now. That's what they're talking about.

In particular, his account of a beating knowledgeable of the murder weapon and knowledgeable of the victim's passive acceptance of the attack showed knowledge of the crime, which would not likely be available to anyone else but the murder. OK, 1987, the court orders a new trial for him. So he's going to get a new trial here now. That's what they're talking about.