James Pietragallo

In particular, his account of a beating knowledgeable of the murder weapon and knowledgeable of the victim's passive acceptance of the attack showed knowledge of the crime, which would not likely be available to anyone else but the murder. OK, 1987, the court orders a new trial for him. So he's going to get a new trial here now. That's what they're talking about.

1990, the verdict is overturned again. Then 1991, the court grants a new trial again as a reinstatement. So they keep going back and forth. The justices here rule for nothing that prosecutors in this case had misrepresented evidence that connected him to the prime. Now it's not even there isn't even a dissenting one.

1990, the verdict is overturned again. Then 1991, the court grants a new trial again as a reinstatement. So they keep going back and forth. The justices here rule for nothing that prosecutors in this case had misrepresented evidence that connected him to the prime. Now it's not even there isn't even a dissenting one.

1990, the verdict is overturned again. Then 1991, the court grants a new trial again as a reinstatement. So they keep going back and forth. The justices here rule for nothing that prosecutors in this case had misrepresented evidence that connected him to the prime. Now it's not even there isn't even a dissenting one.

They said this made up evidence was doubly devastating because not only was it false, but it reduced the pool of assailants again. 1992, the state's attorney announced that Steve will no longer be prosecuted.

They said this made up evidence was doubly devastating because not only was it false, but it reduced the pool of assailants again. 1992, the state's attorney announced that Steve will no longer be prosecuted.

They said this made up evidence was doubly devastating because not only was it false, but it reduced the pool of assailants again. 1992, the state's attorney announced that Steve will no longer be prosecuted.

Based on new scientific evidence, DN fucking A, they said the scientific evidence does not completely exonerate the man, but it raises scientific doubts and leaves us, in my opinion, with no choice but to prosecute him. Yeah. Not to prosecute him. Not to prosecute him. Lynn Scott called the decision courageous and said he made the right decision.

Based on new scientific evidence, DN fucking A, they said the scientific evidence does not completely exonerate the man, but it raises scientific doubts and leaves us, in my opinion, with no choice but to prosecute him. Yeah. Not to prosecute him. Not to prosecute him. Lynn Scott called the decision courageous and said he made the right decision.

Based on new scientific evidence, DN fucking A, they said the scientific evidence does not completely exonerate the man, but it raises scientific doubts and leaves us, in my opinion, with no choice but to prosecute him. Yeah. Not to prosecute him. Not to prosecute him. Lynn Scott called the decision courageous and said he made the right decision.

He freed an innocent man, whether he realizes it or not. I am innocent. Yeah, so that's how that goes. It turns out that based on analysis from CBR Laboratories of Boston, the semen could not have come from Steve, period. Oh, no. End of story. He's excluded as a contributor to that. Oh, no. He did not do this.

He freed an innocent man, whether he realizes it or not. I am innocent. Yeah, so that's how that goes. It turns out that based on analysis from CBR Laboratories of Boston, the semen could not have come from Steve, period. Oh, no. End of story. He's excluded as a contributor to that. Oh, no. He did not do this.

He freed an innocent man, whether he realizes it or not. I am innocent. Yeah, so that's how that goes. It turns out that based on analysis from CBR Laboratories of Boston, the semen could not have come from Steve, period. Oh, no. End of story. He's excluded as a contributor to that. Oh, no. He did not do this.

Good grief. Generally, either that or they murder a lot.

Good grief. Generally, either that or they murder a lot.

Good grief. Generally, either that or they murder a lot.

Oh, my God. So, yeah. So then he starts building a new life and he wrote a book called Maximum Security. Yeah. There they said there are injustices all the time. And we just learned about that. In 2002, he is pardoned by the governor of Illinois, as a matter of fact, so it's not even on his record.

Oh, my God. So, yeah. So then he starts building a new life and he wrote a book called Maximum Security. Yeah. There they said there are injustices all the time. And we just learned about that. In 2002, he is pardoned by the governor of Illinois, as a matter of fact, so it's not even on his record.

Oh, my God. So, yeah. So then he starts building a new life and he wrote a book called Maximum Security. Yeah. There they said there are injustices all the time. And we just learned about that. In 2002, he is pardoned by the governor of Illinois, as a matter of fact, so it's not even on his record.

Then in 2004, the state agrees to pay wrongfully convicted former inmates from a pool of a million dollars. So it looks like he's going to get some cash. He's going to get anywhere from $60,150 to $138,000 in cash. There's two books about this. Neither of them are available in audio or Kindle version. Oh, my God.