James Tavernier

He looked at it and said, that's hit the hand.

I agree with it as well.

He should still be saying...

Still be sent to the monitor?

He's got the monitor, but he should have said that it's inconclusive.

Yeah, well, you can come up with that.

But yeah, Andrew Dallas has sent him to the monitor because for him, it's hit his hand.

It's clear and obvious, Sarah, because John hasn't seen it because it's the blind side of him or whatever else.

So, yeah, listen, we're kind of sitting on the fence in terms of an answer, aren't we?

No, you think it's... Gordon says he doesn't think it's a penalty.

I'm saying I can understand people's arguments on both sides.

What I can't understand is when people say it's not hit his hand at all.

I'm in total disagreement with that.

Andy, does it hit his hand?

it's not hit his hand and even if it did hit even the slightest that ball has been out of play for hitting his head that's a header 40 yards he's hit the ball away I don't understand why people can't understand it can hit your hand and your head why is this so difficult if it hits your hand it doesn't mean that he's caught it or he's parried it down if it hits

if it hits your hand your palm it stops it no no but your fingers are also part of your hand so it can hit it can hit your fingers and bend your like it can it can hit your fingers and move your fingers backwards and still hit your head and you can still head the ball away are we in agreement that I don't agree with that hmm no he's he's buffing his cheeks you better watch what you're doing yeah

I just don't understand how there can be disagreement with it.

Like, the ball can... If someone throws a ball in, you can put your hand up, it can hit your hand, and you can still get the power to head the ball away.

The noise is around the language that was used after it, though, Gordon.

No, because I think a lot of the noise, social media and everything else, is the language that was used after it when speaking about the incident.