Jamie Raskin

She would not commit to meet with them.

She would not commit to create a joint federal state local task force to actually investigate the crimes.

And while she was extremely passionate and animated

In detailed and specific, in talking about certain cases, like the Don Lemon case, for example, she had very little to say about the Epstein files and wanted to change the subject immediately.

And she did that repeatedly as members tried to pin her down.

She would evade.

She would dodge.

She would change the subject.

She would filibuster.

And then she began to resort to ad hominem vilification, demonization, and insults of the members of the committee.

Oh, yeah.

I mean, you know, it would be a great class for seventh graders in logical and rhetorical fallacies because she'd be asked a question about the Epstein survivors.

For example, I said to her, well, Donald Trump wants $10 billion.

because his tax returns were released by a private contractor, and he's suing the IRS for $10 billion.

How much do the Epstein survivors get for your putting their names, their addresses, their phone numbers, in some cases, nude images of them online?

And then she would just radically change the subject.

People would ask her a substantive question, and then she would start saying, well, the Dow is over...

You know, whatever now.

And what about what's happening in your district?

And I don't like what you did about this or that.