Jason Feifer

Things that people are just not going to do.

Things that people are just not going to do.

There are parts of it I like. There are parts of it I don't like.

There are parts of it I like. There are parts of it I don't like.

There are parts of it I like. There are parts of it I don't like.

What I like is that you have a point of view. and that you are approaching it in a way that feels relatable and useful to an audience. I think that's great. I like that you have identified that you have a specific approach that differentiates you in a market. What I don't like is how complicated it is.

What I like is that you have a point of view. and that you are approaching it in a way that feels relatable and useful to an audience. I think that's great. I like that you have identified that you have a specific approach that differentiates you in a market. What I don't like is how complicated it is.

What I like is that you have a point of view. and that you are approaching it in a way that feels relatable and useful to an audience. I think that's great. I like that you have identified that you have a specific approach that differentiates you in a market. What I don't like is how complicated it is.

Because I don't think that you can actually sustain doing a different kind of experiment on yourself every week in a weekly newsletter. I think you will burn yourself out instantly on that. It's too much work. I think you need to find ways to produce a newsletter that really don't take you that much time. Because putting together news, look, consider the experience of a newsletter for people.

Because I don't think that you can actually sustain doing a different kind of experiment on yourself every week in a weekly newsletter. I think you will burn yourself out instantly on that. It's too much work. I think you need to find ways to produce a newsletter that really don't take you that much time. Because putting together news, look, consider the experience of a newsletter for people.

Because I don't think that you can actually sustain doing a different kind of experiment on yourself every week in a weekly newsletter. I think you will burn yourself out instantly on that. It's too much work. I think you need to find ways to produce a newsletter that really don't take you that much time. Because putting together news, look, consider the experience of a newsletter for people.

It's pretty short. People are going to open it. They're going to read it once. They're going to likely delete it. Some people tell me that they save my newsletters, and that's cool. But it's a pretty... It's like an experience in aggregate. It's about building a long-term relationship with people.

It's pretty short. People are going to open it. They're going to read it once. They're going to likely delete it. Some people tell me that they save my newsletters, and that's cool. But it's a pretty... It's like an experience in aggregate. It's about building a long-term relationship with people.

It's pretty short. People are going to open it. They're going to read it once. They're going to likely delete it. Some people tell me that they save my newsletters, and that's cool. But it's a pretty... It's like an experience in aggregate. It's about building a long-term relationship with people.

So each newsletter should be good, but you shouldn't pour a full week's worth of personal experimentation effort into each newsletter. You will run out of topics too quickly, and you will burn yourself out. I'll give you an example of something that is... much smaller in scale, but takes this same sort of approach of distilling academic information to something that's useful.

So each newsletter should be good, but you shouldn't pour a full week's worth of personal experimentation effort into each newsletter. You will run out of topics too quickly, and you will burn yourself out. I'll give you an example of something that is... much smaller in scale, but takes this same sort of approach of distilling academic information to something that's useful.

So each newsletter should be good, but you shouldn't pour a full week's worth of personal experimentation effort into each newsletter. You will run out of topics too quickly, and you will burn yourself out. I'll give you an example of something that is... much smaller in scale, but takes this same sort of approach of distilling academic information to something that's useful.

There's a guy I know named Thomas who has a newsletter called Science Says. And it's very simple. Each week, he finds some academic paper on marketing where they're studying like You know, if you put the price above or below the product in an advertisement, which drives sales more? But these things are buried inside of complicated academic papers. And so he makes it simple. He just...

There's a guy I know named Thomas who has a newsletter called Science Says. And it's very simple. Each week, he finds some academic paper on marketing where they're studying like You know, if you put the price above or below the product in an advertisement, which drives sales more? But these things are buried inside of complicated academic papers. And so he makes it simple. He just...

There's a guy I know named Thomas who has a newsletter called Science Says. And it's very simple. Each week, he finds some academic paper on marketing where they're studying like You know, if you put the price above or below the product in an advertisement, which drives sales more? But these things are buried inside of complicated academic papers. And so he makes it simple. He just...