Jason Hall

Europe is going to continue to be a target for expansion, in addition to Arizona and Japan.

There's the geopolitical part of the story that's also tied to it, that's more than just the AI demand.

If we continue to see monetization, Travis, we're going to talk about Alphabet and how well it's doing in the story of AI and monetization of it with regular people, that maybe this does turn out to be the floor.

But this might be a peak year for a little while.

NVIDIA is definitely the straw that stirs the drink.

There's no doubt about that.

If you think about the importance of its chips and software, as you said, across the full value chain, there's no getting around that.

That goes back to all of the companies that are building AI, that are selling AI products, the companies that are using AI in their businesses.

All of those things do come back to NVIDIA.

Now, here's the thing.

The straw that stirs the drink, that phrase was coined by Reggie Jackson.

Reggie Jackson hit a ton of home runs.

If you look at what Nvidia has done, it's extending its reach as a capital provider across the ecosystem.

I don't think we should discount how important that is.

But like Reggie Jackson, there's also the potential for a ton of striking out to happen here, as it is provided capital across other businesses that are going to need to survive on their own.

Also, the capital sources that they provided may or may not lead to a lot of that capex spending and future revenue that the company is expecting.

Now, TSMC, on the other hand, for me to say that TSMC is more important and maybe primed to be the better business,

is really predicated on Nvidia also continuing to be a really important business and doing really, really well.

If Nvidia really strikes out and as a business we see things start to come unraveled, TSMC is going to suck.

It's not going to be good.