Jay Edelson

We heard about it along with the rest of the world through the recording by the Wall Street Journal.

Going to Tumbler Bridge was, I think, the hardest thing I've ever done professionally.

Everybody is connected to the shooting in some way.

They destroyed this town, not just for this generation, but for generations going forward.

The stories that we've heard of

Kids watching their friends die in front of them.

Teachers who had bullets flying next to them.

It's the worst thing you can imagine.

When you talk to the families, the first thing that they're dealing with is just the enormous amount of grief.

That being said, they are incredibly angry.

That's the centerpiece of our lawsuit.

Certainly when we ask the juries to award, which we'll be asking for historic punitive damages, we want to put them in that room.

It's able to do that in a lot of other contexts.

If you want to engage in racist jokes, for example, it just says no.

I'm not going to do it.

If you ask it to help you commit fraud, she says, not going to do it.

I mean, the whole point of AI is that it's able to contextualize.

So if we're able to read all these chats and understand this is someone who's actually planning a murder and is psychologically unstable, you would think the AI could do that as well.

I guess what your question is suggesting is if they're discussing violence but they end up not actually wanting to go through with it, is there danger to that person?

And I guess at one level I say I really don't care.