JD Vance

Yeah, it's one of the takeaways.

I've talked with these guys before we came on the stage, but during our roundtable and some of the other conversations we've had,

Communication, we absolutely want to ensure there's good communication between federal officials.

And I'm sure that we can do better on that.

So I saw that story and the story is like so much that I read in the mainstream media.

It's missing a whole lot of context.

And we appreciate the context.

It makes sense.

No one is saying, look, there are exceptions, for example.

crazy exception.

If somebody is fired at from inside a house, they don't need a warrant to go inside that person's house.

There are very narrow exceptions to the warrant requirement where law enforcement officers don't need it.

Yeah, no is proposed in the Department of Justice.

is that we can get administrative warrants to enforce administrative immigration law.

Now, it's possible, I guess, that the courts will say no, and of course, if the courts say no, we would follow that law, but nobody is talking about doing immigration enforcement without a warrant.

We're talking about different types of warrants that exist in our system.

Yes.

Shut the fuck up.

Never going to enter somebody's house without some kind of a warrant, unless, of course,

Somebody's firing on an officer or they have to do something in order to protect themselves.