JD Vance

There's no one really investigating Kamala Harris.

But the reach is much less.

The reach is much, much less.

And if you just look at – I mean you're only – you and a few others are the only people who can compare with the actual platform size of an NBC, a CBS.

I mean, yeah, fewer people watch them now than they did 20 years ago.

But if you look, man, you're still getting 5 to 8 million viewers every single night for each of the major networks on the nightly news.

That's incredible reach.

There's still a lot of power there.

And to your point about the comparison, Fox News, number one, if you look at Fox News' viewership compared to NBC's, NBC dwarfs it.

But more importantly in some ways is Fox News, which I do think is very important –

But yeah, they have a right of center bias.

Certainly, I will admit that.

But if you look at how much Fox News is covering the left fairly versus the right, it's much more balanced than like an NBC, right?

Like NBC would never have an interview with Donald J. Trump where the journalist is asking tough questions, but is like sitting down and broadcasting Donald Trump for an hour.

Fox News would do that for Kamala Harris.

And they did do that for Kamala Harris.

And there's a real difference there.

No.

Well, because the expectation is that you're going to interrupt and you're going to fact check and you're going to try to actually do the job of an interviewer.

But the expectation is that if you touch Kamala with anything other than kid gloves.