Jean-Baptiste Kempf

So we're abusing, for example, sometimes cryptography instructions to do certain things.

And there's a level of

beauty and art where it's really you and the processor there's there's there's nothing in between it's you and the the joystick of the cockpit and you move that joystick and it's physically collected to the earlier ones and you can push that plane beyond what it can normally do and there's a level of yeah beauty and amazingness to go that but i don't think the sort of person by person assembly that someone taught me and i've taught multiple people is gonna work

Long run, because of the particular flavor and the way that we do it.

Can they help?

They have more of an understanding than I expected, but they are still...

I've asked it questions and it still goes and starts hallucinating, not hallucinating, but making modifications.

And then I go, is it bit exact?

No, fix it.

And then it just goes and does the same thing.

And it's going, there isn't the corpus of information like Stack Overflow to work on.

People have.

People have their patches, and they say, oh, I studied your lessons, and here's my first changes.

I think it's valuable what they're doing in terms of memory safety as a concept.

Can it achieve some of the speed up that assembly achieves?

Not assembly by hand, no.

I think that's a given.

C, potentially.

But I see it very... It has a very big Esperanto vibe about it.

It's like, we're going to solve this and we're doing this in a particular way.