Jess Weatherbed

That's a much more complicated problem to solve alongside the existing issue of already trying to get thousands of organisations and companies on board with this one system adopting it. So it's not going to be a bulletproof solution. They know that as well.

That's a much more complicated problem to solve alongside the existing issue of already trying to get thousands of organisations and companies on board with this one system adopting it. So it's not going to be a bulletproof solution. They know that as well.

That's a much more complicated problem to solve alongside the existing issue of already trying to get thousands of organisations and companies on board with this one system adopting it. So it's not going to be a bulletproof solution. They know that as well.

The Content Authenticity Initiative were fully transparent with the fact that they said this might help, but it's not going to solve the problem. So we're kind of in a bit of a mess at the minute. There's a bit of a bind. There should have been a lot of things that were put into place before AI got to this point. And now that we're playing catch up, we're too slow.

The Content Authenticity Initiative were fully transparent with the fact that they said this might help, but it's not going to solve the problem. So we're kind of in a bit of a mess at the minute. There's a bit of a bind. There should have been a lot of things that were put into place before AI got to this point. And now that we're playing catch up, we're too slow.

The Content Authenticity Initiative were fully transparent with the fact that they said this might help, but it's not going to solve the problem. So we're kind of in a bit of a mess at the minute. There's a bit of a bind. There should have been a lot of things that were put into place before AI got to this point. And now that we're playing catch up, we're too slow.

And there's not a meaningful way to speed up this process at this moment.

And there's not a meaningful way to speed up this process at this moment.

And there's not a meaningful way to speed up this process at this moment.

It's stored as far as I'm aware on their own independent database where they're trying to set up a process where you can independently check images. That's one avenue. The other avenue was supposed to be that you would access that information through the online platforms where you've already viewed the image that may or may not be fake, right? In terms of

It's stored as far as I'm aware on their own independent database where they're trying to set up a process where you can independently check images. That's one avenue. The other avenue was supposed to be that you would access that information through the online platforms where you've already viewed the image that may or may not be fake, right? In terms of

It's stored as far as I'm aware on their own independent database where they're trying to set up a process where you can independently check images. That's one avenue. The other avenue was supposed to be that you would access that information through the online platforms where you've already viewed the image that may or may not be fake, right? In terms of

actually manipulating that information, it's already been proved that you can do so. There are safeguards in place. I've heard that apparently if you screenshot it using certain desktop software, that metadata can still carry over. There are still systems that can recognise that what you are screenshotting using that software carries the metadata and will carry some of that over.

actually manipulating that information, it's already been proved that you can do so. There are safeguards in place. I've heard that apparently if you screenshot it using certain desktop software, that metadata can still carry over. There are still systems that can recognise that what you are screenshotting using that software carries the metadata and will carry some of that over.

actually manipulating that information, it's already been proved that you can do so. There are safeguards in place. I've heard that apparently if you screenshot it using certain desktop software, that metadata can still carry over. There are still systems that can recognise that what you are screenshotting using that software carries the metadata and will carry some of that over.

But then if I were to take, I don't know, my phone out of my pocket and take a picture of something on my desktop computer, yes, the quality is going to look absolutely awful by that point. But none of that metadata is going to be present. And I still have a copy of that manipulation. So at that point, all of the data is just stripped out and there's nothing you can do.

But then if I were to take, I don't know, my phone out of my pocket and take a picture of something on my desktop computer, yes, the quality is going to look absolutely awful by that point. But none of that metadata is going to be present. And I still have a copy of that manipulation. So at that point, all of the data is just stripped out and there's nothing you can do.

But then if I were to take, I don't know, my phone out of my pocket and take a picture of something on my desktop computer, yes, the quality is going to look absolutely awful by that point. But none of that metadata is going to be present. And I still have a copy of that manipulation. So at that point, all of the data is just stripped out and there's nothing you can do.

Like physical watermarks as well. They've explored that. We can remove those. Samsung's own tool.

Like physical watermarks as well. They've explored that. We can remove those. Samsung's own tool.