Jess Weatherbed

I want my money back. There are so many smaller level challenges. scams and bad intentions that could be fulfilled using these tools that people wouldn't have had the energy or the effort or even the skill if we're being realistic to carry out before because it's not worth the effort. But if I can do that in five seconds, it's quite tempting for some people, I imagine. There's a slippery slope.

I want my money back. There are so many smaller level challenges. scams and bad intentions that could be fulfilled using these tools that people wouldn't have had the energy or the effort or even the skill if we're being realistic to carry out before because it's not worth the effort. But if I can do that in five seconds, it's quite tempting for some people, I imagine. There's a slippery slope.

The way that I've had it explained is that the system itself is absolutely fine. The way that it's supposed to be rolling out is fine. It makes complete sense. The problem is that you need everyone on board for it to work, which is just completely unrealistic. You would need to get people that have completely different ideologies in terms of

The way that I've had it explained is that the system itself is absolutely fine. The way that it's supposed to be rolling out is fine. It makes complete sense. The problem is that you need everyone on board for it to work, which is just completely unrealistic. You would need to get people that have completely different ideologies in terms of

The way that I've had it explained is that the system itself is absolutely fine. The way that it's supposed to be rolling out is fine. It makes complete sense. The problem is that you need everyone on board for it to work, which is just completely unrealistic. You would need to get people that have completely different ideologies in terms of

pro or against generative AI technology to get on board with saying we're going to make this a robust identification system. And unless you have all of the camera makers, all of the editing software makers, all of the online platforms, not just the social media ones, but like literally everywhere where you would see an image on board with this one system.

pro or against generative AI technology to get on board with saying we're going to make this a robust identification system. And unless you have all of the camera makers, all of the editing software makers, all of the online platforms, not just the social media ones, but like literally everywhere where you would see an image on board with this one system.

pro or against generative AI technology to get on board with saying we're going to make this a robust identification system. And unless you have all of the camera makers, all of the editing software makers, all of the online platforms, not just the social media ones, but like literally everywhere where you would see an image on board with this one system.

I don't think it's going to make a meaningful difference. And it doesn't really solve the issue that they do have at the minute, which is how to provide that information that an image is AI generated or just edited using AI in a concise and meaningful way without giving people a wall of text, which no one is going to read, right?

I don't think it's going to make a meaningful difference. And it doesn't really solve the issue that they do have at the minute, which is how to provide that information that an image is AI generated or just edited using AI in a concise and meaningful way without giving people a wall of text, which no one is going to read, right?

I don't think it's going to make a meaningful difference. And it doesn't really solve the issue that they do have at the minute, which is how to provide that information that an image is AI generated or just edited using AI in a concise and meaningful way without giving people a wall of text, which no one is going to read, right?

I'm not going to sit there and read a paragraph of what has gone into a picture on my friend's holiday snaps or something.

I'm not going to sit there and read a paragraph of what has gone into a picture on my friend's holiday snaps or something.

I'm not going to sit there and read a paragraph of what has gone into a picture on my friend's holiday snaps or something.

Meta tried this when they did their Made With AI labels and it went pretty badly because they provided no context and photographers who'd used a couple of what sounded like pretty basic tools in Adobe Photoshop that use a very standard version of generative AI, something like background removal or object select.

Meta tried this when they did their Made With AI labels and it went pretty badly because they provided no context and photographers who'd used a couple of what sounded like pretty basic tools in Adobe Photoshop that use a very standard version of generative AI, something like background removal or object select.

Meta tried this when they did their Made With AI labels and it went pretty badly because they provided no context and photographers who'd used a couple of what sounded like pretty basic tools in Adobe Photoshop that use a very standard version of generative AI, something like background removal or object select.

The system was effectively flagging that and saying, hey, you've used Gen AI, therefore we're going to tag your entire image as being made with this stuff. And it gives the wrong intentions because people see that word AI and they immediately think, OK, fake, this entire thing is fake. So there's no nuance in it.

The system was effectively flagging that and saying, hey, you've used Gen AI, therefore we're going to tag your entire image as being made with this stuff. And it gives the wrong intentions because people see that word AI and they immediately think, OK, fake, this entire thing is fake. So there's no nuance in it.

The system was effectively flagging that and saying, hey, you've used Gen AI, therefore we're going to tag your entire image as being made with this stuff. And it gives the wrong intentions because people see that word AI and they immediately think, OK, fake, this entire thing is fake. So there's no nuance in it.