Jesse Michels

So it's pre-satellites, which is that's remarkable.

And it's they're all in geostationary orbit geo.

So it's like the outer Earth's orbit.

So I think it's.

it's pretty remarkable that does seem really high as well.

I think she says there could be an error rate of up to 30% or something.

So that's a, you know, it's a big margin, but what, what's remarkable is like when she put this out, the main detraction, the main way people tried to kind of straw man or, or, you know, beat, beat this thing was they said, uh, you know, uh,

These have to be plate defects.

These have to be sort of, you know, the astronomical plates, you know, have all sorts of weird, you know, chemical issues over long periods of time.

And you end up with these sort of stains and issues and then, you know, those could look like transients or UFOs.

But then she followed up on the study and she said, is there a, so obviously you have the sun, it's hitting the earth, and then you have the shadow of the earth, right?

You have a kind of a dark side of the earth.

She said, is, you know, are these objects dropping off on the dark side of the earth?

That's right.

Are they physical objects?

Are they reflecting off the sun?

A. And B, if they're plate defects, plate defects would not play favorites between the Earth's shadow and the sun side of the Earth, right?

It would be completely proportional and constant.

Yeah.

And so she found a serious drop-off.