Jim Kwik

Others had to do original content.

And we see declines in working memory.

We see weakened critical thinking skills.

We're seeing shorter and shorter attention spans.

So it's the over-reliance on these external brains I'm concerned about, where AI is incredibly efficient, but where I feel like we have to make choices and who am I to say where that needle should go.

I don't want to replace effort.

you know, just like working out and exercise and physical fitness.

So I think tools should amplify our potential, amplify our impact in our intelligence, but not sedate it, not anesthetize it.

I'm going to err on human.

I am human, so it could be an error.

I think AI mixes.

But in terms of creativity, humans creating something new and originating a new thought, I like that.

Because I think creativity, again, AI is mixing things, but it's not necessarily originating new things.

And that's how I view creativity.

Oh, these are all going to be really close.

I'm very pro-human, so I think a lot of these things are that way.

Because still, they're chess players that are beating AI.

I would go human.

AI analyzes.

Okay, so it depends how you were defining the thing.