Joe Eszterhas

Proponents sometimes link this to Jesus' resurrection.

But the needed radiation, billions of watts without burning the cloth, is far beyond anything observed in nature, and this remains a speculative face-based idea rather than an established physical mechanism.

In short, there's no consensus mechanism, the image transfer process is still unexplained, and every proposed method has serious problems when tested against the cloth's measured properties.

Wild.

I mean, there's no other piece of artwork that's that fascinating.

Because every other art, Michelangelo's work, all this incredible art, it's art.

You see what they did.

There's brush strokes.

There's chisel marks.

They made incredible sculptures.

But it's clearly man-made art.

This is a different thing.

It's a very strange thing.

If you can't recreate it today, if they could recreate it today, people would be doing it.

They'd be making their versions of the Shroud of Turin.

Did they carbon test it?

And what are the arguments that it's older?

Because I do know that there have been some very recent arguments that the testing was incorrect and that it's older.

See if you can find out what that is.

Whether or not AI, whether perplexity, our sponsor, has some sort of a bias.