Joe Huggins

And then the guys go, oh, well, actually, I think it's X and I think it's Y. That type of thing.

And then I think when there's like,

four people or three people or whatever it is you just decide to end the game now if you end the game and it is just all faithfuls then you all win like what happened in season one but if you end the game as four faithfuls but one of you is actually a traitor the traitor wins everything and it so the the whole point of the game which i think the uk public has missed

is you need weaker faithfuls without a following in the final.

So it's a really dangerous position to not be killed or recruited at this moment in time.

Because they're the ones that you need to betray and they're the ones that you need to get to the end.

Yeah, we're obviously all faithfuls, aren't we?

But if someone was a faithful that's in that group but didn't have a following...

Then, for example, like with Wilf last year, he had relatively strong faithfuls, but he also had the, you know, the Kieran moment, the parting gift thing.

Which you're banned from doing that sort of shit now, aren't you?

Well, it's cheating really, isn't it?

Like, because, well, for me, like that is the thrown under the bus thing.

I don't like, and this is why I'm so happy with Ash because she knew that she didn't maybe play a great game and she didn't throw us under the bus.

So 22 people, you're all faithfuls, but three of you are acting and you're actually traitors.

So you can throw someone under the bus by giving... How do I understand less about this now?

That's what I'm trying to...

For example, I'm playing being a faithful every day, and so is all of the traitors.

So if a traitor goes for another traitor, it has to be evidence-based of something that's happened.

But I had... Well, no.

So, for example, with Miles, I went for Miles because Diane told me if I'm poisoned, then it's Miles.