Joey Kocur

So another thing too, though, is he had a similar rant in Winnipeg that we talked about.

And when we had Winnipeg in the St.

Louis series on the broadcast, Bones was in the chair and their captain, Lowry...

He fucking almost cried when Bones was asking him a question.

So regardless of how animated and how passionate he gets, it seems like his former players still love him regardless of his rant.

Or at least the ones that matter.

The guys like Adam Lowry, the guys like the Wierenskis.

I'd be interested to be, I would love to be a fly on the wall in the room with the Renski and bonus and the exit meeting.

Like I'm sure that they'll probably have a conversation about the guys he was actually talking about.

And I feel like the hockey way is, is like the reason he grouped in everybody is you try not to single guys out, right?

It's a team team mentality.

And that's the way it is.

yeah no i'm saying more the reason that when he was given the rant that he said these guys is he didn't want a single guys out via media where i'm sure he's not going to have a problem talking to waddell and saying this fucking guy get him packing he's a fucking yeah we'll know when who they train this summer i think you sit with wierenski i think waddell and bone sits with wierenski

And I know some people hate the fact when you bring players in to make decisions and you say, Zach, who are guys that we cannot win with?

And listen, some players may not want to be a part of that, but I'm guessing Wierenski's career, where he's at, he's probably sick and tired of this too.

Not probably.

Especially just winning the Olympics.

I think they got one more year to figure it out, and if not, Wierenski's going over to Detroit.

Yeah, so that's even more of a reason for them to bring him in and say, Zach, who are guys that we're not getting it done with here?

Here's a problem.