John A. Gentry

They're tough customers.

So the people who want to fight them have got quite a battle ahead of them.

Well, you infiltrate the law schools and you create people who are Marxian in outlook.

You have then people who are appointing judges, for example.

who agree with you.

So that's the whole point of manipulating the flow into the legal system, is that you get ultimate prosecutors, you get, and ultimately then you want judges and decisions that are consistent with your view.

So we have prominently now a number of legal systems

Depending on your perspective, either really good or soft on crime prosecutors around the country, most if not all of whom have been elected.

George Soros has been providing a lot of money to support these people's campaigns and so on.

So here you've got, through the prosecution side, you've got, in essence, a manipulation of the legal system.

And a lot of people who are Marxian in orientation say, we don't care what some of the law says.

We will differentially enforce that which we like.

Some of them are in the federal government administering the law through regulations.

It's another venue.

And they are doing their part to help it succeed.

No.

Well, I mean, they can help, but they're not an asset in the way you and I understand that term from the intelligence world.

So an asset in intelligence would be someone who is to some degree controlled by Russia

a formal representative of a government, like a KGB officer would have an asset in the Defense Department, hypothetically, who would be providing secrets.

No, so they're not assets in that respect at all.