John Ashbrook

I'd try to tell you and you'd be mad at me. You know what I mean? Yeah. Not that I was always right, but like sometimes you're wrong also. And it's the, I think it's the hubris of the Pentagon that needs to be taken down a few notches. You know what I mean?

I'd try to tell you and you'd be mad at me. You know what I mean? Yeah. Not that I was always right, but like sometimes you're wrong also. And it's the, I think it's the hubris of the Pentagon that needs to be taken down a few notches. You know what I mean?

And like, uh, anyway. Yeah. Uh, so I would happily serve this country and make everything better. You know what I mean?

And like, uh, anyway. Yeah. Uh, so I would happily serve this country and make everything better. You know what I mean?

And like, uh, anyway. Yeah. Uh, so I would happily serve this country and make everything better. You know what I mean?

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Let's go. Let's go. Let's call Pete. Pete, where you at? Let's call DJT and see if he's got something for you.

Let's go. Let's go. Let's call Pete. Pete, where you at? Let's call DJT and see if he's got something for you.

Let's go. Let's go. Let's call Pete. Pete, where you at? Let's call DJT and see if he's got something for you.

Since January 20th, district courts have now issued 40 universal injunctions against the federal government, including 35 from the same five judicial districts. This is a bipartisan problem that has now spanned the last five presidential administrations. Universal injunctions exceed the judicial power granted in Article III, which exists only to address the injury to the complaining party.

Since January 20th, district courts have now issued 40 universal injunctions against the federal government, including 35 from the same five judicial districts. This is a bipartisan problem that has now spanned the last five presidential administrations. Universal injunctions exceed the judicial power granted in Article III, which exists only to address the injury to the complaining party.

Since January 20th, district courts have now issued 40 universal injunctions against the federal government, including 35 from the same five judicial districts. This is a bipartisan problem that has now spanned the last five presidential administrations. Universal injunctions exceed the judicial power granted in Article III, which exists only to address the injury to the complaining party.

They transgress the traditional bounds of equitable authority, and they create a host of practical problems. Such injunctions prevent the percolation of novel and difficult legal questions. They encourage rampant forum shopping. They require judges to make rushed, high-stakes, low-information decisions.

They transgress the traditional bounds of equitable authority, and they create a host of practical problems. Such injunctions prevent the percolation of novel and difficult legal questions. They encourage rampant forum shopping. They require judges to make rushed, high-stakes, low-information decisions.

They transgress the traditional bounds of equitable authority, and they create a host of practical problems. Such injunctions prevent the percolation of novel and difficult legal questions. They encourage rampant forum shopping. They require judges to make rushed, high-stakes, low-information decisions.

We are not claiming that because we're conceding that there could be an inappropriate case.

We are not claiming that because we're conceding that there could be an inappropriate case.

We are not claiming that because we're conceding that there could be an inappropriate case.