John Ashbrook

We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that Wurtz in 1963 was really the first universal injunction. There's a dispute about Perkins against Lukens Oil going back to 1940. And of course, we point to the court's opinion that reversed that universal injunction issued by the D.C. Circuit and said it's profoundly wrong.

We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that Wurtz in 1963 was really the first universal injunction. There's a dispute about Perkins against Lukens Oil going back to 1940. And of course, we point to the court's opinion that reversed that universal injunction issued by the D.C. Circuit and said it's profoundly wrong.

We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that Wurtz in 1963 was really the first universal injunction. There's a dispute about Perkins against Lukens Oil going back to 1940. And of course, we point to the court's opinion that reversed that universal injunction issued by the D.C. Circuit and said it's profoundly wrong.

So when the court is considered to address this, it is consistently said you have to limit the remedy to the plaintiffs appearing in court and complaining of that remedy.

So when the court is considered to address this, it is consistently said you have to limit the remedy to the plaintiffs appearing in court and complaining of that remedy.

So when the court is considered to address this, it is consistently said you have to limit the remedy to the plaintiffs appearing in court and complaining of that remedy.

That's exactly correct. And in fact, those are very limited, very rare. Even in the 1960s, it really exploded in 2007.

That's exactly correct. And in fact, those are very limited, very rare. Even in the 1960s, it really exploded in 2007.

That's exactly correct. And in fact, those are very limited, very rare. Even in the 1960s, it really exploded in 2007.

Percolation of novel, sensitive constitutional issues is a merit of our system. It is not a bad feature of the system.

Percolation of novel, sensitive constitutional issues is a merit of our system. It is not a bad feature of the system.

Percolation of novel, sensitive constitutional issues is a merit of our system. It is not a bad feature of the system.

it's also sort of funny to me like they're so effusive in their praise of kamala harris like at some point it sort of undercuts whether she was actually qualified if you have to say it every time you mention her you know it's true the the other thing is like it's obvious the reason why she lost it was all the damaging video and audio of her from when she ran for president back in 2020 uh it was being tethered to his terrible administration so like of course it's easy for

it's also sort of funny to me like they're so effusive in their praise of kamala harris like at some point it sort of undercuts whether she was actually qualified if you have to say it every time you mention her you know it's true the the other thing is like it's obvious the reason why she lost it was all the damaging video and audio of her from when she ran for president back in 2020 uh it was being tethered to his terrible administration so like of course it's easy for

it's also sort of funny to me like they're so effusive in their praise of kamala harris like at some point it sort of undercuts whether she was actually qualified if you have to say it every time you mention her you know it's true the the other thing is like it's obvious the reason why she lost it was all the damaging video and audio of her from when she ran for president back in 2020 uh it was being tethered to his terrible administration so like of course it's easy for

for him to be like, well, it was misogyny and racism. That's why she went down because then he doesn't have to admit the thing that he was a terrible president.

for him to be like, well, it was misogyny and racism. That's why she went down because then he doesn't have to admit the thing that he was a terrible president.

for him to be like, well, it was misogyny and racism. That's why she went down because then he doesn't have to admit the thing that he was a terrible president.

It is about as torturous as I've ever seen. And on Sonny's part too there, like she is trying to hand this off to Biden and hopefully he can take it from there, right? Like, okay, she wants to straight face tell us what the question was. Like, what sort of wins would you have changed? Like, that's an actual question you would ask a person? It doesn't make any logical sense. That's exactly right.

It is about as torturous as I've ever seen. And on Sonny's part too there, like she is trying to hand this off to Biden and hopefully he can take it from there, right? Like, okay, she wants to straight face tell us what the question was. Like, what sort of wins would you have changed? Like, that's an actual question you would ask a person? It doesn't make any logical sense. That's exactly right.