John Bickley

Joining us with more is Daily Wire reporter and editor Virginia Kruda, who served in the Army for 10 years herself. Hey, Virginia. So first, what exactly has Hegseth announced here?

So what is Hegseth really saying here? Does this mean an end to women in combat roles or is there another way to look at this?

So what is Hegseth really saying here? Does this mean an end to women in combat roles or is there another way to look at this?

How did we get here?

How did we get here?

But then Panetta decided to change all of this. What was the rationale there?

But then Panetta decided to change all of this. What was the rationale there?

And that, according to the defense secretary's announcement, is exactly what happened. So why didn't anyone reverse course before now?

And that, according to the defense secretary's announcement, is exactly what happened. So why didn't anyone reverse course before now?

Major moves by the new defense secretary. We'll see how this is received. Virginia, thank you so much for reporting.

Major moves by the new defense secretary. We'll see how this is received. Virginia, thank you so much for reporting.

Joining us to discuss is Colorado State Representative Jarvis Caldwell. Thank you so much for joining us.

Joining us to discuss is Colorado State Representative Jarvis Caldwell. Thank you so much for joining us.

So first of all, will you tell us what just happened? We have a law that was just passed in Colorado. Catch us up to speed here.

So first of all, will you tell us what just happened? We have a law that was just passed in Colorado. Catch us up to speed here.

All right, so let's walk through what's exactly in this. This is from the summary. Section 2 provides that when making child custody decisions and determining the best interests of a child for purposes of parenting time, a court shall consider deadnaming, misgendering, or threatening to publish material related to an individual's gender-affirming health care services as types of coercive control.

All right, so let's walk through what's exactly in this. This is from the summary. Section 2 provides that when making child custody decisions and determining the best interests of a child for purposes of parenting time, a court shall consider deadnaming, misgendering, or threatening to publish material related to an individual's gender-affirming health care services as types of coercive control.

What are we supposed to make of that?

What are we supposed to make of that?

Now Section 3 establishes effectively what is called a transgender sanctuary law for the state. Can you explain what's going on there?