John Hultgren

So the goals have changed along the way.

But now we may see even more new goals when we come to the change table.

Who knows?

Yes, the conclusion of Trump is actually surprisingly stable, although at a very low level.

The war against Iran is exactly the opposite of what Trump promised before the election, and it has actually been decisive for his MAGA base.

He wanted to end endless wars far away, and instead fight America first, as we have heard many times.

And we see some in MAGA who are protesting hard, but there hasn't been a lot of protests that we can see that far.

They can come.

I think we can expect parties that look totally different on what is the situation.

Iran comes to a meeting with the instruction that they have forced the world's largest military power in the knee.

They are celebrating now as if there was a victory there.

The regime is still there and Iran has shown what power it has by being able to close the Hormuz-street.

USA comes with a very different attitude.

They think that USA has won 100%, as Trump says.

And now these will sit down and agree on point after point.

I think we can wait very hard negotiations in the first round about Hormuz, about the sanctions, about the nuclear program and about Israel's further war in Lebanon.

If they manage to agree on these, then hope increases for that they can also agree on the rest of the points.

Så absolutt.

Nei, det tror jeg ikke vi kan si.

Trump sier jo i et øyeblikk at krigen er så godt som ferdig, men så sier han etterpå at USA ikke vil gi seg for fienden er totalt og kontant beseiret.