John Morgan

I think more than even the national pride, I think, honestly, Ben, that the Chinese see this as the future of the world, of China and of Europe, perhaps, but China versus America. And for three, four years now, Chinese officials, top figures, have been saying openly that China China is the dominant power now. And here we have the test.

I think more than even the national pride, I think, honestly, Ben, that the Chinese see this as the future of the world, of China and of Europe, perhaps, but China versus America. And for three, four years now, Chinese officials, top figures, have been saying openly that China China is the dominant power now. And here we have the test.

President Trump has set it up, which might seem to be perhaps a bit unwise. The China Daily, which speaks specifically for President Xi, says caving into US pressure is out of the question. They're putting it all on the line. There's no possibility of backing down from that. If China does cave in to American pressure, then President Xi Jinping himself will pay the price for it.

President Trump has set it up, which might seem to be perhaps a bit unwise. The China Daily, which speaks specifically for President Xi, says caving into US pressure is out of the question. They're putting it all on the line. There's no possibility of backing down from that. If China does cave in to American pressure, then President Xi Jinping himself will pay the price for it.

And that's how they see it. I think that President Trump in some ways sees it in the same way as being an all-out attack between China and America. But I think he believes that the US can win it. I'm not sure that many outside people would say that.

And that's how they see it. I think that President Trump in some ways sees it in the same way as being an all-out attack between China and America. But I think he believes that the US can win it. I'm not sure that many outside people would say that.

Yes, as long as he wins. But, you know, every Chinese leader and Xi Jinping more than anybody else has to remember that the stability of China comes first. And the danger of an all out tariff war with China, OK, it's three, four percent of world trade. But nevertheless, it's an enormous amount of world trade.

Yes, as long as he wins. But, you know, every Chinese leader and Xi Jinping more than anybody else has to remember that the stability of China comes first. And the danger of an all out tariff war with China, OK, it's three, four percent of world trade. But nevertheless, it's an enormous amount of world trade.

And somebody was saying yesterday, somebody in Wall Street was saying that 80% of the trade between China and the US can be affected by this.

And somebody was saying yesterday, somebody in Wall Street was saying that 80% of the trade between China and the US can be affected by this.

Director Ratcliffe, this was a huge mistake, correct? No. A national political reporter was made privy to sensitive information about imminent military operations against a foreign terrorist organization.

Director Ratcliffe, this was a huge mistake, correct? No. A national political reporter was made privy to sensitive information about imminent military operations against a foreign terrorist organization.

This is an embarrassment. This is utterly unprofessional. There's been no apology. There has been no recognition of the gravity of this error. And by the way, we will get the full transcript of this chain and your testimony will be measured carefully against its content.

This is an embarrassment. This is utterly unprofessional. There's been no apology. There has been no recognition of the gravity of this error. And by the way, we will get the full transcript of this chain and your testimony will be measured carefully against its content.

I think at the end of this trial we will have a good idea of that. One of the difficulties with this sort of treatment is how do you measure the outcome? Now, you may think that that's an obvious question because, as you've just heard from Carol, they hope that their disease will get better and their symptoms will go away. But that can actually take quite a while.

I think at the end of this trial we will have a good idea of that. One of the difficulties with this sort of treatment is how do you measure the outcome? Now, you may think that that's an obvious question because, as you've just heard from Carol, they hope that their disease will get better and their symptoms will go away. But that can actually take quite a while.

That could take several months to really switch off. And in the meantime, we need to have some tests which tell us that we are actually affecting patients. the parts of the immune system that are causing the disease.

That could take several months to really switch off. And in the meantime, we need to have some tests which tell us that we are actually affecting patients. the parts of the immune system that are causing the disease.

So if at the end of this trial, when we've analysed all the blood samples, we see that change in the blood, then that's really exciting because it tells us we're on the right track and it will give us markers with which to design future trials.

So if at the end of this trial, when we've analysed all the blood samples, we see that change in the blood, then that's really exciting because it tells us we're on the right track and it will give us markers with which to design future trials.