John Solomon

And that instruction came

through his chief of staff, James Rubicki.

So both men claim that they were authorized to leak in this timeframe around the October 2016 Wall Street Journal article.

Now, I will agree with you, Megan, this is the thinnest worded indictment I have ever seen as a reporter.

It is so lean, I was looking for an introduction, didn't even get that.

Exactly, it is that lean.

We're going to get more details next week.

I think there'll be either an FBI affidavit in support of it, and then when the arraignment comes, we'll get a little bit more detail.

But I was shocked by the leanness.

Based on the documents we have, we believe it involves that Wall Street Journal article in October 2016.

Ask them to leak.

Yeah, listen, they're all talking about the same story and who leaked when what and who approved what when what's most important in this chain of events, the one clearest

direction to leak, one that doesn't have the muddled up analysis of the inspector general or the problems of Andy McCabe's own credibility.

is what James Baker said.

James Baker is unequivocal in his interview with the Postal Inspection Service.

We put that document out.

You were kind enough to have me on your show.

We talked about it then.

I think it's a really important document.

It is a claim by a member of the Comey inner circle that he was instructed in advance to leak something and that what he leaked was classified information.