John Solomon

And that instruction came from James Comey through the chief of staff.

So if you're the United States Justice Department, when you bring this case, you're going to have to bring in James Rabicki, James Baker, and Andy McCabe, and you're going to have to synchronize their stories.

Rabicki is the chief of staff who allegedly gave the instruction from Comey to them.

Now, we also know that there are some emails and text messages, and I would not be surprised that in the next version of this indictment or the next affidavit from the

FBI agent that we get a little bit more flesh on the bone.

But there's a lot to still be answered here.

And I think that our suspicions are well-founded.

We need to get more data than we got in the original indictment.

And in there, there were some remarkable claims.

And when they first got released by the Trump Justice Department, ironically, the Trump Justice Department

redacted the most important piece of information, this story by James Baker.

We appealed to the Justice Department, and Pam Bondi intervened and got it unredacted, and that's when we got this piece.

So it's a timeline that someone in the FBI decided to write.

When you look at it, it looks a little bit like a CYA timeline, like, hey, if anyone ever asks, I want you to let you know what really went on with these leak investigations.

And in the middle of that timeline is this extraordinary story, which we have corroborated independent of the timeline,

that Baker gave this testimony, and he stands by that testimony to this very day.

Isn't it an irony that what may ultimately be, if this turns out to be the article, again, the indictment is so thin, we don't know what article they were speaking about, but ultimately.

And then there's a piece of classified information that's disclosed.

We still don't know what James Baker leaked.

We know it's in the same time frame as the article of that.