John Solomon

Major changes to security.

There were people who were fired.

There were hearings and blue ribbon panels.

Great Britain took such a breach of the election system very seriously.

But in America, the CIA, the FBI, the DHS,

uh in the end of the trump in the beginning of the binary just deep six it didn't let anybody know so we head into the 2026 not even the president yeah does that and they're not evidence that the president but the reason i say that is because uh we have now a report from the ombudsman for the united states intelligence community and that ombudsman wrote that his name is barry zoloff and he wrote that this evidence was kept from the president himself

specifically because U.S.

intelligence analysts inside the CIA, inside the FBI, inside the Homeland Security Department didn't like Donald Trump.

They called him the vulgarian in the Oval Office.

That's actually what they wrote about their commander in chief in their own emails.

And that they chose not to brief on this because they didn't want Donald Trump's policies on China to succeed.

So you have an intelligence committee caught red handed, putting their political interests ahead of their country's interests.

That's a great question, right?

We're a week into these revelations.

The White House hasn't driven a narrative from the podium.

You don't see Carolyn Levin talk about it on the podium, even though the evidence is absolutely dispositive.

We've put

the declassified evidence into the, you know, the president has put it up on truth.

He's raised some concerns about it.

The president's intelligence advisory board, chaired by Devin Nunes, they announced today that they're going to be investigating this.