John Solomon

That testimony, those comments, seemed to be at odds with the evidence.

And so James Comey would know

whether the CIA was bugging him to send over the Steele dossier so they could make this conclusion.

He becomes a critical witness.

You could potentially have James Comey be a hostile witness against John Brennan and the indictment.

Federal officials tell me that the House Intelligence Committee is going to schedule a vote next week to vote out and send to the grand jury, send to the prosecutors, its contacts with John Brennan over the years so that all of those testimonies and private briefings can be viewed by grand jurors to see when and how and what Brennan said over the years about various issues that are now tied up in the weaponization process.

At the end of the day, this part of the case, which is only a small part of the case, is looking at one element of the intelligence community being politically weaponized.

In other words, did the intelligence community in late 16 and early 17 put its political viewpoints ahead of its country by declaring Donald Trump was being aided by Russia in the absence of such evidence because they wanted to create a political narrative that would hurt Donald Trump?

Now, that's directly connected.

to the second issue we've been talking about the last week, which was did that same intelligence community four years later in another election and in the aftermath of another election, once again, put politics before country by trying to keep secret from President Trump, from the Congress, from the American public,

evidence it had that multiple states voted out of registration had been penetrated and obtained and analyzed by China.

Now, when that revelation occurred in Great Britain, it was a national scandal over the seas, across the pond.

It probably should be a national scandal here, but we were kept from that knowledge for six years and

We now know from the documents the intelligence ombudsman made public that the assessment of the ombudsman was that they kept that China interference, election interference data quiet and secret, even from the president, because the intelligence community didn't like Donald Trump

They didn't like his policies on China, and they didn't want to give him data that they thought would help him execute his China policy.

Once again, putting politics before the interest of your country, the interest of your commander-in-chief.

So what's going on in Florida, what's going on in Washington now, have a direct line, the same issue, a politicized intelligence community that's not doing its job, not serving its president, not serving its country.

That seems to be the case.

I'll just tell you some truisms.

I've had questions pending for more than 10 days at the CIA that asked the CIA, how many states and which states does the CIA know had their voter registration data accessed by China?