John Solomon

Well, we don't know who approved the search warrant request, so those are important things.

We've got to get those documents unmasked in the court.

But now we're getting a sense of it.

I think the package that comes out today will give us new characters, new players, and new opportunities to get to the bottom of this.

But this potentially is prosecutable.

It could be a disparable offense if you lied as a lawyer.

And, of course, it gives President Trump a tort that could be pretty significant on the civil side.

Yeah, we know that Merrick Garland knew about the raid.

Whether he was told that the FBI had objected to the lack of probable cause and that this was not a lawful raid, not clear yet.

We'll see what these documents say, and that's going to lead to some new questioning.

I don't think we'll get an answer in the first batch of documents.

My FBI sources don't know whether Merrick Garland was told of the objections.

Clearly, the line prosecutors were.

And that's what these emails are going to discuss.

So I think we got to wait for the documents.

These are very legitimate questions.

And this is a really serious matter.

You raided the Republican candidate's home as the opposition party, and you may have done so over the objections of the FBI and in violation of the standard for search warrants, which is you have to have probable cause.

Those are big things.

The Democrats are saying, but we found documents.