John

And it seems like you hold more open-ended, we're talking about it until we figure it out type meetings.

Yeah.

Yeah, but as you say, it's like a little bit of a, we've really ground it down, but it's a little bit of a different problem space because we're dealing with a much more heterogeneous set of fraud vectors here than we are.

How do you feel now, looking back on politics and doing stuff there, where it feels like, looking from the outside in, two things have been quite impactful.

One, the America PAC, and two, the acquisition of Twitter at the time.

But also, it seems like there was a bunch of heartache.

And so what's your grading of the whole experience?

What is the next step?

Not so much to ask.

There's an argument that the people doing AI want a very large number of chips as quickly as possible.

And then many of the input suppliers, the fabs, but also the turbine manufacturers,

are not ramping up production very quickly.

The explanation you hear is that they're dispositionally conservative.

They're Taiwanese or German, as the story may be.

And they just don't believe the say.

Is that really the explanation, or is there something else?

Are there other, are there other ideas you think others should go pursue that you're not for whatever reasons right now?

I don't even mean within AI.

I mean just generally.

You joked or were self-conscious about using the limiting factor phrase again.