Jonathan Fields

And you're like, you didn't hear anything I just said.

You're like, you're not actually listening to me.

And I wonder if there's so much pressure on them to just record that they can't really listen to you.

And maybe this actually helps shift that.

What's the difference in dynamic between a single person trying to get to an answer and a small collective of people trying to do the same thing together?

Yeah, I mean, that makes sense to me.

And I think, you know, when part of the medical training, right, is rounding, you know, so you have somebody who's going around with a group of young, either students or young docs, and you walk into a patient's room and they're all discussing often in front of the patient, like what they think is going on.

And

It just seems like it would be so valuable.

And it seems like the value of that would get higher and higher and higher as it's not just med students or really young docs, but if you could regularly have very experienced people sharing this on a regular basis.

And I wonder, does that really start to fall away the more senior you get?

Or does that experience remain as a regular practice when you're trying to diagnose the further you get into your career?

Yeah.

I mean, that just makes so much sense to me.

And there are these sort of iconic institutions like the Mayo or Cleveland Clinic and places like that where they staff that way.

Basically, you get a whole team.

It's not siloed.

You get all the different specialties together, talking to each other and sharing information and brainstorming together and trying to figure it all out.

I often wonder why that isn't just a more common model.

And when you take somebody, like what happens to people psychologically and socially when they're told they've seen a battery of practitioners, right?