Jonathan Turley

If you can pack the Supreme Court successfully, those things become less important as to whether you can make the case as opposed to make the court.

Well, it is a legitimate concern.

I've been critical of some aspects of Attorney General Bondi, and I've been complimentary of others.

Although, look, that's certainly been the case of every attorney general in my lifetime, every president in my lifetime.

But a good test of that is going to be the Clinton impeachment, sorry, Clinton contempt sanction.

The Clintons did an extraordinary thing by telling the House Oversight Committee to pound sand.

They had a legitimate subpoena, lawfully issued, but on a bipartisan vote, and they just said, we don't feel like it.

It is the most open and clear case of contempt I have seen in my lifetime.

Now, I think the Clintons are counting on the fact that they might be able to play this out until after the Trump administration.

If there's a Democratic president, they'll scuttle this effort.

But what if they don't?

You know, it does take a long time to put cases together.

What if the next president is named Vance?

The fact is, I don't see any cognizable defense here.

One of the things I've been writing about is this is the first time where there's not even a suggestion of a defense.

It's just basically, we're the Clintons, and we don't feel like showing up.

So this would be the world's fastest trial.

Now, this goes to your point, Glenn, that they may be counting on the fact

that they would be tried in Washington, DC.

And it's pretty hard to imagine a jury pool in Washington without at least one person who wouldn't convict the Clintons if they had a video of them committing heinous crimes.