Jonathan Turley

But they can't count on that.

And this is going to be a real test to our system.

Democrats voted to hold them in contempt.

That's another difference here.

So you not only have a bipartisan vote for the subpoenas, you have a bipartisan vote to hold them in contempt.

And the Department of Justice needs to move with the speed of the Biden administration.

They went to zero to 60 on Bannon and other figures.

Let's see if they can do it here.

Well, you know, I've always said the odds are against the president on IEPA.

But I have to tell you, after the oral argument, I said, you know, it's not as clear as people suggest.

The justices did, I would say, a majority have serious questions about the president's interpretation.

But if you look closely, they had different reasons.

And so how that cycles out in the final vote is something we'll have to see.

But if they do... Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

Well, because some, we've seen justices who disagree with an interpretation of the majority, but still wrote a concurrence with the majority.

And they can choose whether it's a concurrence or a dissent.

So is it possible you could have...

a divided court, maybe a plurality that preserves the tariffs.

Yeah, they could fracture on the rationale and you could have some that say that they will concur with upholding the tariffs.

All of that is possible.