Jonathan Turley

But if he if the administration loses

There are a myriad of other tariff provisions that they can rely on.

So the tariffs are not going to immediately go away.

Also, even if the court rules against the administration, it could make any relief prospective so that they don't have to return the money.

So there's a lot of elements here that we really don't know.

And that's why we're all waiting to see that opinion get handed down.

You know, I would always guess that because IEPA is silent that they lose it.

I thought that Solicitor General Sauer did one of the best jobs I've seen in front of the Supreme Court.

And man, he made some great arguments.

And his main argument is, look, IEPA is based on a prior statute with the same language.

And you said under that statute, a president has tariff authorities.

I thought that was a real haymaker of a point.

And we'll have to see if the justices, when they drill down on this, go, well, yeah, that is a bit of a problem, isn't it?

You know, I talk about this in Rage of the Republic and saying that I don't think we're going to get this cat to walk backwards.

AI is now integrated so thoroughly in various industries.

I do not think that any given state is going to be able to seriously curtail it or even a government can curtail it.

I don't think the EU could curtail it if they wanted to, which they don't.

So AI is here and it's going to continue to grow.

What we can do is to reinforce its protections.

For example, I talk about in the book how AI has been accused, for example, of inducing suicide or enabling suicide with teens.