Jordan Peterson

At Harvard, DEI criteria influenced hiring in 70% of faculty of arts and sciences searches by 2022 per internal reports. Promotion and tenure decisions also weighed DEI contributions. So that's not only...

A DEI contribution, a statement, is not only your willingness to proclaim allegiance to an ideological doctrine, so a belief statement, it's also an indication of your willingness to sell your soul to the devil because you've been told to by an administrator. Right. So make no mistake about this. This isn't merely political corruption, you know, analyzed from a conservative perspective.

A DEI contribution, a statement, is not only your willingness to proclaim allegiance to an ideological doctrine, so a belief statement, it's also an indication of your willingness to sell your soul to the devil because you've been told to by an administrator. Right. So make no mistake about this. This isn't merely political corruption, you know, analyzed from a conservative perspective.

A DEI contribution, a statement, is not only your willingness to proclaim allegiance to an ideological doctrine, so a belief statement, it's also an indication of your willingness to sell your soul to the devil because you've been told to by an administrator. Right. So make no mistake about this. This isn't merely political corruption, you know, analyzed from a conservative perspective.

I don't like those progressives. I don't like the progressives, the Marxists. I think they're appalling to the core and that their doctrine is genocidally murderous and unforgivable. In the same category, by the way, as the Nazi doctrines in the extreme. But even independent of that,

I don't like those progressives. I don't like the progressives, the Marxists. I think they're appalling to the core and that their doctrine is genocidally murderous and unforgivable. In the same category, by the way, as the Nazi doctrines in the extreme. But even independent of that,

I don't like those progressives. I don't like the progressives, the Marxists. I think they're appalling to the core and that their doctrine is genocidally murderous and unforgivable. In the same category, by the way, as the Nazi doctrines in the extreme. But even independent of that,

I think the willingness of faculty members and researchers to pen these bloody statements, to say that those were their words, to sign themselves to those beliefs, indicates that they don't deserve public support at all. And I don't think you should send your children to those institutions. They're gone.

I think the willingness of faculty members and researchers to pen these bloody statements, to say that those were their words, to sign themselves to those beliefs, indicates that they don't deserve public support at all. And I don't think you should send your children to those institutions. They're gone.

I think the willingness of faculty members and researchers to pen these bloody statements, to say that those were their words, to sign themselves to those beliefs, indicates that they don't deserve public support at all. And I don't think you should send your children to those institutions. They're gone.

Just like CNN, just like MSNBC, and just like the New York Times, who we happen to be assessing today. He believes, Dr. Garber, he's the new president of Harvard University. We'll get to that too, why he's the new president. This is genuinely unprecedented, Dr. Garber said. We have so many challenges ahead and we also have so many opportunities. Yeah, blah, blah, blah.

Just like CNN, just like MSNBC, and just like the New York Times, who we happen to be assessing today. He believes, Dr. Garber, he's the new president of Harvard University. We'll get to that too, why he's the new president. This is genuinely unprecedented, Dr. Garber said. We have so many challenges ahead and we also have so many opportunities. Yeah, blah, blah, blah.

Just like CNN, just like MSNBC, and just like the New York Times, who we happen to be assessing today. He believes, Dr. Garber, he's the new president of Harvard University. We'll get to that too, why he's the new president. This is genuinely unprecedented, Dr. Garber said. We have so many challenges ahead and we also have so many opportunities. Yeah, blah, blah, blah.

This is a time when we should be doubling down on our investments in research, particularly in science. Yeah, Dr. Garber, that assumes that what's happening in those labs is research and science. And by and large, it's not. We haven't even talked about what's happening to publishing.

This is a time when we should be doubling down on our investments in research, particularly in science. Yeah, Dr. Garber, that assumes that what's happening in those labs is research and science. And by and large, it's not. We haven't even talked about what's happening to publishing.

This is a time when we should be doubling down on our investments in research, particularly in science. Yeah, Dr. Garber, that assumes that what's happening in those labs is research and science. And by and large, it's not. We haven't even talked about what's happening to publishing.

He believes deep funding cuts would impair the kind of innovative work that has made American research universities the global engine for scientific discovery since World War II. No, not since World War II. From World War II till probably about the year 2000, right? And that's now 25 years ago. So no, Dr. Carver, wrong.

He believes deep funding cuts would impair the kind of innovative work that has made American research universities the global engine for scientific discovery since World War II. No, not since World War II. From World War II till probably about the year 2000, right? And that's now 25 years ago. So no, Dr. Carver, wrong.

He believes deep funding cuts would impair the kind of innovative work that has made American research universities the global engine for scientific discovery since World War II. No, not since World War II. From World War II till probably about the year 2000, right? And that's now 25 years ago. So no, Dr. Carver, wrong.

So the White House has said Harvard should not receive federal money if Jewish students are targeted and harassed on its campus. Well, I think we could dispense with the if, personally. So, because that's obviously the case. In the eyes of Mr. Trump, this is classic New York Times, right? Just, you can just, what would you say? This lie should annoy you?