Jordan Peterson

University leaders often say that criticism exaggerates the issue, claiming that critics want to perpetuate woke caricatures of university culture in order to win elections. Yeah, fine, there's four stellar sentences from the lying scoundrels at the New York Times. Let's just delve into this a little bit using some facts.

University leaders often say that criticism exaggerates the issue, claiming that critics want to perpetuate woke caricatures of university culture in order to win elections. Yeah, fine, there's four stellar sentences from the lying scoundrels at the New York Times. Let's just delve into this a little bit using some facts.

In the eyes of Mr. Trump, that mega maniac, well, we already talked about the fact that 3% at best of faculty are conservative, and either zero or 1% very conservative, And that the administration, and there's a lot more people in the administration than there are faculty members, they're even more skewed, so there's that. But let's look at the researchers here.

In the eyes of Mr. Trump, that mega maniac, well, we already talked about the fact that 3% at best of faculty are conservative, and either zero or 1% very conservative, And that the administration, and there's a lot more people in the administration than there are faculty members, they're even more skewed, so there's that. But let's look at the researchers here.

In the eyes of Mr. Trump, that mega maniac, well, we already talked about the fact that 3% at best of faculty are conservative, and either zero or 1% very conservative, And that the administration, and there's a lot more people in the administration than there are faculty members, they're even more skewed, so there's that. But let's look at the researchers here.

90% of faculty at elite institutions include DEI statements in applications. Many of them have tailored their research to align with DEI priorities. That means developing studies, for example, on racial disparities. And then let's talk a little bit more about how the researchers have responded to these DEI statements.

90% of faculty at elite institutions include DEI statements in applications. Many of them have tailored their research to align with DEI priorities. That means developing studies, for example, on racial disparities. And then let's talk a little bit more about how the researchers have responded to these DEI statements.

90% of faculty at elite institutions include DEI statements in applications. Many of them have tailored their research to align with DEI priorities. That means developing studies, for example, on racial disparities. And then let's talk a little bit more about how the researchers have responded to these DEI statements.

Candidates with stronger DEI statements, which means more radically progressive and left and also bigger lies, assuming that they weren't radically progressive left people and just filled these things out because they had to, as seen in Harvard's 2021 hiring of Sherry Charleston as its first chief diversity officer, despite plagiarism allegations.

Candidates with stronger DEI statements, which means more radically progressive and left and also bigger lies, assuming that they weren't radically progressive left people and just filled these things out because they had to, as seen in Harvard's 2021 hiring of Sherry Charleston as its first chief diversity officer, despite plagiarism allegations.

Candidates with stronger DEI statements, which means more radically progressive and left and also bigger lies, assuming that they weren't radically progressive left people and just filled these things out because they had to, as seen in Harvard's 2021 hiring of Sherry Charleston as its first chief diversity officer, despite plagiarism allegations.

A high profile example from UC Berkeley, that hellish joint, a high profile example from UC Berkeley's life science initiatives, 2018 to 2019, faculty search demonstrates the impact of DEI statements. In this initiative, 600 out of 900 applicants, about 70%, were eliminated Hear that? Eliminated. That means their lives were altered severely.

A high profile example from UC Berkeley, that hellish joint, a high profile example from UC Berkeley's life science initiatives, 2018 to 2019, faculty search demonstrates the impact of DEI statements. In this initiative, 600 out of 900 applicants, about 70%, were eliminated Hear that? Eliminated. That means their lives were altered severely.

A high profile example from UC Berkeley, that hellish joint, a high profile example from UC Berkeley's life science initiatives, 2018 to 2019, faculty search demonstrates the impact of DEI statements. In this initiative, 600 out of 900 applicants, about 70%, were eliminated Hear that? Eliminated. That means their lives were altered severely.

That means that despite having worked like mad as high school students and undergraduates and graduate students, having put in 20 years of work into being educated, they were eradicated from consideration for a top-tier job

That means that despite having worked like mad as high school students and undergraduates and graduate students, having put in 20 years of work into being educated, they were eradicated from consideration for a top-tier job

That means that despite having worked like mad as high school students and undergraduates and graduate students, having put in 20 years of work into being educated, they were eradicated from consideration for a top-tier job

Regardless of their bloody research prowess, that's their publication record, which was the only true record of their capability, 70% of them were eliminated from consideration, stamped, gone. because their DEI statements didn't what? Didn't please who? Exactly. How about the radical progressives who swarmed because they weren't doing their research to the bloody hiring committees?

Regardless of their bloody research prowess, that's their publication record, which was the only true record of their capability, 70% of them were eliminated from consideration, stamped, gone. because their DEI statements didn't what? Didn't please who? Exactly. How about the radical progressives who swarmed because they weren't doing their research to the bloody hiring committees?

Regardless of their bloody research prowess, that's their publication record, which was the only true record of their capability, 70% of them were eliminated from consideration, stamped, gone. because their DEI statements didn't what? Didn't please who? Exactly. How about the radical progressives who swarmed because they weren't doing their research to the bloody hiring committees?