Jordan Peterson

How about that? 70% were eliminated in the first round based solely on their DEI statements. So let's say you have some poor character who's got 20 publications when he emerges from graduate school. That's a stellar record. In fact, that's a record that's much better than Claudine Gay, who was made president of Harvard University, for example.

How about that? 70% were eliminated in the first round based solely on their DEI statements. So let's say you have some poor character who's got 20 publications when he emerges from graduate school. That's a stellar record. In fact, that's a record that's much better than Claudine Gay, who was made president of Harvard University, for example.

How about that? 70% were eliminated in the first round based solely on their DEI statements. So let's say you have some poor character who's got 20 publications when he emerges from graduate school. That's a stellar record. In fact, that's a record that's much better than Claudine Gay, who was made president of Harvard University, for example.

So we're talking about people whose research records exceed that of the woman who was promoted to president at Harvard. Those people aren't going to be considered for a position at Berkeley and other high-level institutions allegiance to political belief was deemed improper or insufficiently craven. So don't tell me this is a bloody Trump problem. That's such a lie.

So we're talking about people whose research records exceed that of the woman who was promoted to president at Harvard. Those people aren't going to be considered for a position at Berkeley and other high-level institutions allegiance to political belief was deemed improper or insufficiently craven. So don't tell me this is a bloody Trump problem. That's such a lie.

So we're talking about people whose research records exceed that of the woman who was promoted to president at Harvard. Those people aren't going to be considered for a position at Berkeley and other high-level institutions allegiance to political belief was deemed improper or insufficiently craven. So don't tell me this is a bloody Trump problem. That's such a lie.

The search committee used a rubric that prioritized candidates' knowledge of DEI, track record, and plans for advancing it. Right, oh yes, what... The last time I looked at the Engineering and Research Council grant application in Canada, it's frequently asked questions, it said this,

The search committee used a rubric that prioritized candidates' knowledge of DEI, track record, and plans for advancing it. Right, oh yes, what... The last time I looked at the Engineering and Research Council grant application in Canada, it's frequently asked questions, it said this,

The search committee used a rubric that prioritized candidates' knowledge of DEI, track record, and plans for advancing it. Right, oh yes, what... The last time I looked at the Engineering and Research Council grant application in Canada, it's frequently asked questions, it said this,

If you have a lab that's notable for its diversity, which means if you've been as craven as you possibly could have in following every single bloody dictate that we imposed on you in the last 10 years, don't just rest on your laurels, because no matter how good a job you've done in the past, you could do better in the future. And so we don't wanna see that you're already

If you have a lab that's notable for its diversity, which means if you've been as craven as you possibly could have in following every single bloody dictate that we imposed on you in the last 10 years, don't just rest on your laurels, because no matter how good a job you've done in the past, you could do better in the future. And so we don't wanna see that you're already

If you have a lab that's notable for its diversity, which means if you've been as craven as you possibly could have in following every single bloody dictate that we imposed on you in the last 10 years, don't just rest on your laurels, because no matter how good a job you've done in the past, you could do better in the future. And so we don't wanna see that you're already

running a lab where minorities of the multiplicitous form that we insist upon existing are overrepresented, no matter how well you've done, that's not good enough. And your bloody DEI statement better indicate that no matter how craven you've been in the past, you should be a little more craven in the present. Sickening. Sickening.

running a lab where minorities of the multiplicitous form that we insist upon existing are overrepresented, no matter how well you've done, that's not good enough. And your bloody DEI statement better indicate that no matter how craven you've been in the past, you should be a little more craven in the present. Sickening. Sickening.

running a lab where minorities of the multiplicitous form that we insist upon existing are overrepresented, no matter how well you've done, that's not good enough. And your bloody DEI statement better indicate that no matter how craven you've been in the past, you should be a little more craven in the present. Sickening. Sickening.

This case, highlighted in City Journal and National Association of Scholars reports, suggests DEI statements can be a significant gatekeeper. Yeah, well, there's... something damned by faint praise.

This case, highlighted in City Journal and National Association of Scholars reports, suggests DEI statements can be a significant gatekeeper. Yeah, well, there's... something damned by faint praise.

This case, highlighted in City Journal and National Association of Scholars reports, suggests DEI statements can be a significant gatekeeper. Yeah, well, there's... something damned by faint praise.

Faculty promotions increasingly hinge on DEI activities, sidelining traditional metrics like publication impact, which is really the metric that scientists have decided on over a hundred years, best indexes their research productivity and ability. That's merit, merit.

Faculty promotions increasingly hinge on DEI activities, sidelining traditional metrics like publication impact, which is really the metric that scientists have decided on over a hundred years, best indexes their research productivity and ability. That's merit, merit.