Jordan Peterson

Okay, so they're really taken dry. They aren't dry. Absent new technology.

Okay, so they're really taken dry. They aren't dry. Absent new technology.

Okay, so they're really taken dry. They aren't dry. Absent new technology.

So what do you think a reasonable timeframe, when we're thinking about ensuring future natural resources, let's say... Given the rate of technological transformation, we can't predict out 200 years. We certainly can't predict out 100 years. When we're thinking about whether we'll run out of something, do you have any sense of what a reasonable timeframe of computation would be?

So what do you think a reasonable timeframe, when we're thinking about ensuring future natural resources, let's say... Given the rate of technological transformation, we can't predict out 200 years. We certainly can't predict out 100 years. When we're thinking about whether we'll run out of something, do you have any sense of what a reasonable timeframe of computation would be?

So what do you think a reasonable timeframe, when we're thinking about ensuring future natural resources, let's say... Given the rate of technological transformation, we can't predict out 200 years. We certainly can't predict out 100 years. When we're thinking about whether we'll run out of something, do you have any sense of what a reasonable timeframe of computation would be?

We don't run out of things.

We don't run out of things.

We don't run out of things.

This is why the economists are always at war with the biologists. Correct. Because the biologists have fallen into this foolish Malthusian thinking. And the economists say, no. No. We're innovative enough so that we switch directions. Correct.

This is why the economists are always at war with the biologists. Correct. Because the biologists have fallen into this foolish Malthusian thinking. And the economists say, no. No. We're innovative enough so that we switch directions. Correct.

This is why the economists are always at war with the biologists. Correct. Because the biologists have fallen into this foolish Malthusian thinking. And the economists say, no. No. We're innovative enough so that we switch directions. Correct.

And that is... You see, the biologists should understand this because the fundamental distinction between human beings and all other animals is that our environment is not fixed.

And that is... You see, the biologists should understand this because the fundamental distinction between human beings and all other animals is that our environment is not fixed.

And that is... You see, the biologists should understand this because the fundamental distinction between human beings and all other animals is that our environment is not fixed.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Right? It's unbelievably malleable, which is why we can live everywhere.

Right? It's unbelievably malleable, which is why we can live everywhere.