Josh Holmes

That's a whole new connotation on the Sandinistas, isn't it?

That's a whole new connotation on the Sandinistas, isn't it?

That's a whole new connotation on the Sandinistas, isn't it?

Yeah. Yeah, I mean, look, a big part of the progressive left's agenda and what they've tried to accomplish basically since 1960 is institutional capture. And it goes everywhere from corporate America, entertainment industry, higher education to, in this case, one of the three branches of the federal government. And this is why it was so important.

Yeah. Yeah, I mean, look, a big part of the progressive left's agenda and what they've tried to accomplish basically since 1960 is institutional capture. And it goes everywhere from corporate America, entertainment industry, higher education to, in this case, one of the three branches of the federal government. And this is why it was so important.

Yeah. Yeah, I mean, look, a big part of the progressive left's agenda and what they've tried to accomplish basically since 1960 is institutional capture. And it goes everywhere from corporate America, entertainment industry, higher education to, in this case, one of the three branches of the federal government. And this is why it was so important.

that what happened from 2017 to 2021 in terms of appellate court judges and the Supreme Court is ultimately what they've been trying to do at this federal court level, district court level, is have what you're seeing playing out in front of everybody right now, which is just a leftist agenda with no basis in law. Now, because of the work that Donald Trump did the first four years,

that what happened from 2017 to 2021 in terms of appellate court judges and the Supreme Court is ultimately what they've been trying to do at this federal court level, district court level, is have what you're seeing playing out in front of everybody right now, which is just a leftist agenda with no basis in law. Now, because of the work that Donald Trump did the first four years,

that what happened from 2017 to 2021 in terms of appellate court judges and the Supreme Court is ultimately what they've been trying to do at this federal court level, district court level, is have what you're seeing playing out in front of everybody right now, which is just a leftist agenda with no basis in law. Now, because of the work that Donald Trump did the first four years,

that this is going to run up against a real life problem for the left and that they've got a whole bunch of courts throughout this country at the at the appellate level that actually interpret the law right and i think to your point it's a good one megan like yes it just it delays the process and it it makes everybody focused on the wrong things here but i mean your audience should have at least a little bit of confidence in that because of the first four years of work

that this is going to run up against a real life problem for the left and that they've got a whole bunch of courts throughout this country at the at the appellate level that actually interpret the law right and i think to your point it's a good one megan like yes it just it delays the process and it it makes everybody focused on the wrong things here but i mean your audience should have at least a little bit of confidence in that because of the first four years of work

that this is going to run up against a real life problem for the left and that they've got a whole bunch of courts throughout this country at the at the appellate level that actually interpret the law right and i think to your point it's a good one megan like yes it just it delays the process and it it makes everybody focused on the wrong things here but i mean your audience should have at least a little bit of confidence in that because of the first four years of work

that the Trump administration has done, we will ultimately get to the right place.

that the Trump administration has done, we will ultimately get to the right place.

that the Trump administration has done, we will ultimately get to the right place.

I mean, the idea that you can't actually look to see if 175 year old American is still receiving social security and not, I don't know, blow the whistle on that for fear that a 40 year old somewhere is probably not going to get their social security because they've been exhausted by fraud for generations before them. Like that is the kind of thing that is the reason you elect presidents.

I mean, the idea that you can't actually look to see if 175 year old American is still receiving social security and not, I don't know, blow the whistle on that for fear that a 40 year old somewhere is probably not going to get their social security because they've been exhausted by fraud for generations before them. Like that is the kind of thing that is the reason you elect presidents.

I mean, the idea that you can't actually look to see if 175 year old American is still receiving social security and not, I don't know, blow the whistle on that for fear that a 40 year old somewhere is probably not going to get their social security because they've been exhausted by fraud for generations before them. Like that is the kind of thing that is the reason you elect presidents.

And it's going to be thrown out, actually actually punted out of court at some level. But it doesn't completely alleviate the discomfort at the front end.

And it's going to be thrown out, actually actually punted out of court at some level. But it doesn't completely alleviate the discomfort at the front end.