Josh Johnson

So I think we put it all on the AI instead of putting it on employers and companies and like a corporate mindset and everything.

When it comes to stand-up, people want to show up and have an experience with other people.

And I think that that's something that can't be replaced by AI, at least in that sphere, right?

As far as writing goes, there are definitely going to be people who would opt

to, whether it's for money or for ease, because they aren't great collaborators, work with an AI and try to be better prompt writers than better collaborators and writers.

That's all, I guess, well and good.

We'll see how far you get with that.

Just because the thing that AI does to people that I don't feel like anyone talks about because it is embarrassing,

having the entire world of possibility mixed up in the internet for like A and B testing and for mixing and matching everything that should be copyrighted, right?

Having all of the human history that has been digitized and stolen only reveals to you how few ideas you really have.

You know what I mean?

When you are sitting in front of a thing that's like, this is a text to image AI, right?

Type in anything you want, I'll give you an image of it.

First five minutes, you're probably pumping out stuff that seems funny, fun.

I'll show somebody this, whatever.

After an hour, you're like, oh, I don't know what I would do with this.

But this thing only exists because of the ideas that we have.

So it's a vicious cycle that doesn't really go anywhere.

And so I think that when the bubble pops, it won't be in some dramatic way where employers are like, we're hiring everybody back because we were wrong.

I think it will just quietly be people realizing that it is a tool, but it is not a replacement, you know?