Journalist
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
A New York grand jury has just indicted him on murder in the first degree in furtherance of terrorism. The terrorism charge basically is saying he targeted this CEO for a social purpose and reason. That is a form of terrorism.
I have never seen a case like this. It has a life and an energy of its own on social media.
I have never seen a case like this. It has a life and an energy of its own on social media.
It's too much. And then all the merchandise that people are trying to sell.
It's too much. And then all the merchandise that people are trying to sell.
You can see it in his posts all over social media.
You can see it in his posts all over social media.
Why does it have to be a classified briefing if these are just hobbyist drones, they're not military drones? Why is it a classified briefing on the Capitol Hill?
Why does it have to be a classified briefing if these are just hobbyist drones, they're not military drones? Why is it a classified briefing on the Capitol Hill?
Your first concern is that somebody's falsely accused?
Your first concern is that somebody's falsely accused?
Your first concern is that somebody's falsely accused?
And we are out of time, but I will say that these things don't happen in a vacuum. I understand your point, but it's also freedom of speech. People have a right, just like you're expressing your opinion.
And we are out of time, but I will say that these things don't happen in a vacuum. I understand your point, but it's also freedom of speech. People have a right, just like you're expressing your opinion.
And we are out of time, but I will say that these things don't happen in a vacuum. I understand your point, but it's also freedom of speech. People have a right, just like you're expressing your opinion.
It was unmistakable. They were so loud because I think those people viewed it as positive.
It was unmistakable. They were so loud because I think those people viewed it as positive.
I have to say that the mistrial was almost anticlimactic because I think people were waiting to hear what this jury of 12, okay, they've sat through this whole thing. They've heard all the evidence from both sides. What... Where are they going with this? And we never got that.
I have to say that the mistrial was almost anticlimactic because I think people were waiting to hear what this jury of 12, okay, they've sat through this whole thing. They've heard all the evidence from both sides. What... Where are they going with this? And we never got that.
Things can happen so quickly, and you kind of wonder, like, what did the judge just say? What does this necessarily mean for this motion? Or did that get denied? Or did she approve that? So I guess I kind of understand just from being a bystander in the courtroom how it can go very quickly.