Juliana Kim

As of Wednesday, there were over 2,100 guard forces in D.C.

That includes troops from several states.

In a statement, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson asserted that Trump was well within his authority to send the guard to D.C.

in order to, quote, protect federal assets and assist law enforcement.

Julianna Kim, NPR News.

U.S.

District Judge Gia Cobb ruled that by sending thousands of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., President Trump undermined the city's autonomy and presented harms to the nation's capitals.

She issued a temporary block on the deployment, but it won't take effect until next month in order to give the Trump administration time to appeal.

As of Wednesday, there were over 2,100 guard forces in D.C.

That includes troops from several states.

In a statement, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson asserted that Trump was well within his authority to send the guard to D.C.

in order to, quote, protect federal assets and assist law enforcement.

Julianna Kim, NPR News.

Thanks for having us.

Thanks for having us.

Thanks for having us.

Well, American courts are really structured around due process. And if the prosecution puts together a case, for example, using AI, and the defense wants to go back and duplicate what the prosecution did to test the results to ensure that due process was followed on the part of the prosecutor, there's really no way to test that. And so courts are highly suspect of it.

Well, American courts are really structured around due process. And if the prosecution puts together a case, for example, using AI, and the defense wants to go back and duplicate what the prosecution did to test the results to ensure that due process was followed on the part of the prosecutor, there's really no way to test that. And so courts are highly suspect of it.

Well, American courts are really structured around due process. And if the prosecution puts together a case, for example, using AI, and the defense wants to go back and duplicate what the prosecution did to test the results to ensure that due process was followed on the part of the prosecutor, there's really no way to test that. And so courts are highly suspect of it.

I mean, you're right there at the boundary of law and ethics, but I think the evidence rules altogether, if you look at them comprehensively, they're really designed to make sure that anything that comes into court is truthful, is just, and, for example, relevant to the actual case, and that it's fair.