Juliana Kim

I mean, you're right there at the boundary of law and ethics, but I think the evidence rules altogether, if you look at them comprehensively, they're really designed to make sure that anything that comes into court is truthful, is just, and, for example, relevant to the actual case, and that it's fair.

I mean, you're right there at the boundary of law and ethics, but I think the evidence rules altogether, if you look at them comprehensively, they're really designed to make sure that anything that comes into court is truthful, is just, and, for example, relevant to the actual case, and that it's fair.

So if we can utilize AI to make it more just, credible, truthful, and fair, that's a good thing. Like in the case where someone has a disability that does not allow themselves, they can't communicate for themselves, but they have more control over what the AI avatar is actually saying and their expression, but they couldn't do that same level of communication.

So if we can utilize AI to make it more just, credible, truthful, and fair, that's a good thing. Like in the case where someone has a disability that does not allow themselves, they can't communicate for themselves, but they have more control over what the AI avatar is actually saying and their expression, but they couldn't do that same level of communication.

So if we can utilize AI to make it more just, credible, truthful, and fair, that's a good thing. Like in the case where someone has a disability that does not allow themselves, they can't communicate for themselves, but they have more control over what the AI avatar is actually saying and their expression, but they couldn't do that same level of communication.

I think that has huge potential in courts. And from the victim statement point of view, if we want to be fair to victims and people who might be eligible for parole, then maybe a video attendance at those hearings is more fair. Because it's difficult for the victim to return every so many years and retell the same story and be re-traumatized in the same way.

I think that has huge potential in courts. And from the victim statement point of view, if we want to be fair to victims and people who might be eligible for parole, then maybe a video attendance at those hearings is more fair. Because it's difficult for the victim to return every so many years and retell the same story and be re-traumatized in the same way.

I think that has huge potential in courts. And from the victim statement point of view, if we want to be fair to victims and people who might be eligible for parole, then maybe a video attendance at those hearings is more fair. Because it's difficult for the victim to return every so many years and retell the same story and be re-traumatized in the same way.

And so if the AI tool can help a victim communicate themselves, express what happened truthfully, then I think there's great use there. Where it's used to distort those things, then it's not a good thing.

And so if the AI tool can help a victim communicate themselves, express what happened truthfully, then I think there's great use there. Where it's used to distort those things, then it's not a good thing.

And so if the AI tool can help a victim communicate themselves, express what happened truthfully, then I think there's great use there. Where it's used to distort those things, then it's not a good thing.

just from a humanization point of view, who owns my digital persona?

just from a humanization point of view, who owns my digital persona?

just from a humanization point of view, who owns my digital persona?

I happened to be redoing my will when I was having this conversation with you guys, and I decided I'm going to add a statement in there that says this is who I want in control of my digital persona once I pass away.

I happened to be redoing my will when I was having this conversation with you guys, and I decided I'm going to add a statement in there that says this is who I want in control of my digital persona once I pass away.

I happened to be redoing my will when I was having this conversation with you guys, and I decided I'm going to add a statement in there that says this is who I want in control of my digital persona once I pass away.

just from a humanization point of view, who owns my digital persona? I think that to me is the most interesting part. You know, if you think about it, you know, I could go out on the internet and I could generate a digital persona, Brittany, that in many ways are like you, but they're not you. And so who owns that? And it's highlighted in this particular case because the sister of Mm-hmm.

just from a humanization point of view, who owns my digital persona? I think that to me is the most interesting part. You know, if you think about it, you know, I could go out on the internet and I could generate a digital persona, Brittany, that in many ways are like you, but they're not you. And so who owns that? And it's highlighted in this particular case because the sister of Mm-hmm.

just from a humanization point of view, who owns my digital persona? I think that to me is the most interesting part. You know, if you think about it, you know, I could go out on the internet and I could generate a digital persona, Brittany, that in many ways are like you, but they're not you. And so who owns that? And it's highlighted in this particular case because the sister of Mm-hmm.