Julie Kelly

So there were two cameras that the FBI relied on, um, for the suspect outside of the DNC. And that was the DNC security footage.

So there were two cameras that the FBI relied on, um, for the suspect outside of the DNC. And that was the DNC security footage.

So there were two cameras that the FBI relied on, um, for the suspect outside of the DNC. And that was the DNC security footage.

I know you'll all, you already know this, but your listeners will be shocked to hear that the exact location, the two benches, the shrub outside of the DNC headquarters, oddly in the most surveilled city in the world, somehow the camera pointing at where the bomb was planted, wasn't working or there wasn't one or some, you know, something weird.

I know you'll all, you already know this, but your listeners will be shocked to hear that the exact location, the two benches, the shrub outside of the DNC headquarters, oddly in the most surveilled city in the world, somehow the camera pointing at where the bomb was planted, wasn't working or there wasn't one or some, you know, something weird.

I know you'll all, you already know this, but your listeners will be shocked to hear that the exact location, the two benches, the shrub outside of the DNC headquarters, oddly in the most surveilled city in the world, somehow the camera pointing at where the bomb was planted, wasn't working or there wasn't one or some, you know, something weird.

So the FBI relied on, we're told these, the security system on the DNC. Well, you have two different angles, two different cameras. One, which is the one that Darren Beatty has exposed as moving at one frame per second, which is like 1950 era technology. But then Dan, the other camera that they have footage from allegedly footage from is moves at a much faster pace.

So the FBI relied on, we're told these, the security system on the DNC. Well, you have two different angles, two different cameras. One, which is the one that Darren Beatty has exposed as moving at one frame per second, which is like 1950 era technology. But then Dan, the other camera that they have footage from allegedly footage from is moves at a much faster pace.

So the FBI relied on, we're told these, the security system on the DNC. Well, you have two different angles, two different cameras. One, which is the one that Darren Beatty has exposed as moving at one frame per second, which is like 1950 era technology. But then Dan, the other camera that they have footage from allegedly footage from is moves at a much faster pace.

So why is the one angle, and this is related to the quote-unquote new footage that they released last week, why is that camera at one frame per second when the other camera is not?

So why is the one angle, and this is related to the quote-unquote new footage that they released last week, why is that camera at one frame per second when the other camera is not?

So why is the one angle, and this is related to the quote-unquote new footage that they released last week, why is that camera at one frame per second when the other camera is not?

Well, what the FBI did and stupidly thought no one would catch it, which we did, is they slowed down the frame rate on the faster camera to make it look like it was in sync from the two different angles of the pipe bomber allegedly setting the device down. So of course we found that and expose that as well.

Well, what the FBI did and stupidly thought no one would catch it, which we did, is they slowed down the frame rate on the faster camera to make it look like it was in sync from the two different angles of the pipe bomber allegedly setting the device down. So of course we found that and expose that as well.

Well, what the FBI did and stupidly thought no one would catch it, which we did, is they slowed down the frame rate on the faster camera to make it look like it was in sync from the two different angles of the pipe bomber allegedly setting the device down. So of course we found that and expose that as well.

But what Darren has suggested in, you know, this too, is that because it's at one frame per second, that lends itself to easily doctoring the video even more. So Dan, this footage, the D the FBI has had since early 2021, because at that time in March of 2021, they posted a clip from that camera angle. at 7.43 when the pipe bomber sat down and used his phone.

But what Darren has suggested in, you know, this too, is that because it's at one frame per second, that lends itself to easily doctoring the video even more. So Dan, this footage, the D the FBI has had since early 2021, because at that time in March of 2021, they posted a clip from that camera angle. at 7.43 when the pipe bomber sat down and used his phone.

But what Darren has suggested in, you know, this too, is that because it's at one frame per second, that lends itself to easily doctoring the video even more. So Dan, this footage, the D the FBI has had since early 2021, because at that time in March of 2021, they posted a clip from that camera angle. at 7.43 when the pipe bomber sat down and used his phone.

So all of a sudden, magically, they have a new clip from the same camera angle just nine minutes later, but they release it the day after House Republicans blow open their phony investigation and their stonewalling by the FBI and misrepresentations by the guy who headed the investigation, Stephen D'Antuano. So, I mean, this is, again, they think that they're

So all of a sudden, magically, they have a new clip from the same camera angle just nine minutes later, but they release it the day after House Republicans blow open their phony investigation and their stonewalling by the FBI and misrepresentations by the guy who headed the investigation, Stephen D'Antuano. So, I mean, this is, again, they think that they're